Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16670714›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2006

A phase II study of single-agent gefitinib as first-line therapy in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer.

R Suzuki, Y Hasegawa, K Baba, H Saka, H Saito, H Taniguchi, M Yamamoto, S Matsumoto, K Kato, T Oishi and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Gefitinib in non small cell lung cancer.Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology · 2011
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

R SuzukiToyohashi Municipal Hospital, 50 Hachiken-nishi, Aotake, Toyohashi, Aichi 441-8570, Japan. rsuzuki-alg@umin.ac.jp
Y Hasegawa
K Baba
H Saka
H Saito
H Taniguchi
M Yamamoto
S Matsumoto
K Kato
T Oishi
K Imaizumi
K Shimokata
Toyohashi Municipal Hospital · JPAichi Cancer Center · JPAichi Medical University · JPHanda City Hospital · JPNagoya Ekisaikai Hospital · JPNagoya University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of gefitinib ('IRESSA') in Japanese patients with previously untreated stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This was a multi-institutional phase II study. Thirty-four patients with previously untreated stage IV NSCLC were enrolled between May 2003 and September 2004. Gefitinib was administered orally 250 mg once a day and was continued until there was either disease progression or severe toxicity. Objective tumour response rate was 26.5% (95% confidence interval, 11.7-41.3%). Adverse events were generally mild (National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria grade 1 or 2) and consisted mainly of skin rash, fatigue and liver dysfunction. No pulmonary toxicity was observed. The global health status revealed that there was no change in quality of life during the study. This study found that single-agent gefitinib is active and well tolerated in chemo-naive Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleGefitinibHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingQuinazolinesSurvival AnalysisTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsGefitinibQuinazolines

Identifiers

PMID16670714
PMCPMC2361326
OpenAlexW2025037368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.