Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16670008›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2006

Characterizing disease states from topological properties of transcriptional regulatory networks.

David P Tuck, Harriet M Kluger, Yuval Kluger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Network Medicine: New Paradigm in the -Omics Era.Anatomy & physiology : current research · 2011
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A decade of systems biology.Annual review of cell and developmental biology · 2010
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Protein networks in disease.Genome research · 2008
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David P TuckDepartment of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510, USA. david.tuck@yale.edu
Harriet M Kluger
Yuval Kluger
Yale University · USNew York University · US

Funding

Predicting Melanoma Response to BAY 43-9006/ChemotherapyR01CA115756 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KLUGER, HARRIET M. · 2005 to 2008
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA115756NCI NIH HHS R01CA115756-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh throughput gene expression experiments yield large amounts of data that can augment our understanding of disease processes, in addition to classifying samples. Here we present new paradigms of data Separation based on construction of transcriptional regulatory networks for normal and abnormal cells using sequence predictions, literature based data and gene expression studies. We analyzed expression datasets from a number of diseased and normal cells, including different types of acute leukemia, and breast cancer with variable clinical outcome.

resultsWe constructed sample-specific regulatory networks to identify links between transcription factors (TFs) and regulated genes that differentiate between healthy and diseased states. This approach carries the advantage of identifying key transcription factor-gene pairs with differential activity between healthy and diseased states rather than merely using gene expression profiles, thus alluding to processes that may be involved in gene deregulation. We then generalized this approach by studying simultaneous changes in functionality of multiple regulatory links pointing to a regulated gene or emanating from one TF (or changes in gene centrality defined by its in-degree or out-degree measures, respectively). We found that samples can often be separated based on these measures of gene centrality more robustly than using individual links. We examined distributions of distances (the number of links needed to traverse the path between each pair of genes) in the transcriptional networks for gene subsets whose collective expression profiles could best separate each dataset into predefined groups. We found that genes that optimally classify samples are concentrated in neighborhoods in the gene regulatory networks. This suggests that genes that are deregulated in diseased states exhibit a remarkable degree of connectivity.

conclusionTranscription factor-regulated gene links and centrality of genes on transcriptional networks can be used to differentiate between cell types. Transcriptional network blueprints can be used as a basis for further research into gene deregulation in diseased states.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticBiomarkers, TumorComputer SimulationDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedGene Expression ProfilingHumansModels, GeneticNeoplasmsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisSignal TransductionTranscription FactorsBiomarkers, TumorTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID16670008
PMCPMC1482723
OpenAlexW1864299022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.