ArticleBMC bioinformatics2006
Characterizing disease states from topological properties of transcriptional regulatory networks.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Six novel immunoglobulin genes as biomarkers for better prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer by gene co-expression network analysis.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- LPRP: A Gene-Gene Interaction Network Construction Algorithm and Its Application in Breast Cancer Data Analysis.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2018Article
- Graph-theoretical model of global human interactome reveals enhanced long-range communicability in cancer networks.PloS one · 2017Article
- Network topology measures for identifying disease-gene association in breast cancer.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Using prior knowledge from cellular pathways and molecular networks for diagnostic specimen classification.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Increased signaling entropy in cancer requires the scale-free property of protein interaction networks.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Pathway mapping and development of disease-specific biomarkers: protein-based network biomarkers.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2015Review
- Integrative network-based approach identifies key genetic elements in breast invasive carcinoma.BMC genomics · 2015Article
- Topology of molecular interaction networks.BMC systems biology · 2013Review
- Differential network entropy reveals cancer system hallmarks.Scientific reports · 2012Article
- Network Medicine: New Paradigm in the -Omics Era.Anatomy & physiology : current research · 2011Article
- Mathematical descriptions of biochemical networks: stability, stochasticity, evolution.Progress in biophysics and molecular biology · 2011Review
- A multiple network learning approach to capture system-wide condition-specific responses.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2011Article
- Increased entropy of signal transduction in the cancer metastasis phenotype.BMC systems biology · 2010Article
- A decade of systems biology.Annual review of cell and developmental biology · 2010Review
- Computational identification of a p38SAPK-regulated transcription factor network required for tumor cell quiescence.Cancer research · 2009Article
- An effective tri-clustering algorithm combining expression data with gene regulation information.Gene regulation and systems biology · 2009Article
- Modeling and characterization of disease associated subnetworks in the human interactome using machine learning.Summit on translational bioinformatics · 2009Article
- Transcription factors: their potential as targets for an individualized therapeutic approach to cancer.Cancer gene therapy · 2009Review
- Protein networks in disease.Genome research · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHigh throughput gene expression experiments yield large amounts of data that can augment our understanding of disease processes, in addition to classifying samples. Here we present new paradigms of data Separation based on construction of transcriptional regulatory networks for normal and abnormal cells using sequence predictions, literature based data and gene expression studies. We analyzed expression datasets from a number of diseased and normal cells, including different types of acute leukemia, and breast cancer with variable clinical outcome.
resultsWe constructed sample-specific regulatory networks to identify links between transcription factors (TFs) and regulated genes that differentiate between healthy and diseased states. This approach carries the advantage of identifying key transcription factor-gene pairs with differential activity between healthy and diseased states rather than merely using gene expression profiles, thus alluding to processes that may be involved in gene deregulation. We then generalized this approach by studying simultaneous changes in functionality of multiple regulatory links pointing to a regulated gene or emanating from one TF (or changes in gene centrality defined by its in-degree or out-degree measures, respectively). We found that samples can often be separated based on these measures of gene centrality more robustly than using individual links. We examined distributions of distances (the number of links needed to traverse the path between each pair of genes) in the transcriptional networks for gene subsets whose collective expression profiles could best separate each dataset into predefined groups. We found that genes that optimally classify samples are concentrated in neighborhoods in the gene regulatory networks. This suggests that genes that are deregulated in diseased states exhibit a remarkable degree of connectivity.
conclusionTranscription factor-regulated gene links and centrality of genes on transcriptional networks can be used to differentiate between cell types. Transcriptional network blueprints can be used as a basis for further research into gene deregulation in diseased states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.