Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16665208›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology1987

Permeabilizing soybean protoplasts to macromolecules using electroporation and hypotonic shock.

A J Cutler, M Saleem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 1987. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A J CutlerPlant Biotechnology Institute, National Research Council, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0W9, Canada.
M Saleem

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The percentage of soybean cell culture protoplasts permeabilized by electroporation was dependent on the voltage and the number of successive pulses that were applied. Best results were obtained with two 50 milliseconds, 400 volts per centimeter pulses after which 78% of the surviving protoplasts had been permeabilized to the fluorescent dye calcein. Quantitation of the volume of extracellular fluid taken up was performed using radioactive inulin (molecular weight 5000-5500). Typically between 20 and 40 nanoliters of fluid was taken up by 10(6) protoplasts. Electroporation and hypotonic shock treatments (M Saleem, AJ Cutler 1986 J Plant Physiol 124: 11-21) were compared with respect to the volume of fluid taken up under optimum conditions. Electroporation produced 10 times more uptake than hypotonic shock treatment. In all experiments there was a direct relationship between the number of protoplasts lysed and both the amount of fluid taken up and the percentage of surviving protoplasts that were permeabilized.

Identifiers

PMID16665208
PMCPMC1056292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.