Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16653188›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology1992

The Isolation of Actin from Pea Roots by DNase I Affinity Chromatography.

J M Andersland, A T Jagendorf, M V Parthasarathy

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J M AnderslandSection of Plant Biology, Plant Science Building, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853.
A T Jagendorf
M V Parthasarathy
Cornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Native actin can be isolated from pea (Pisum sativum L.) roots by DNase I affinity chromatography, but the resulting yields and quality of actin are variable. By use of two assays for actin, a DNase I inhibition assay and a gel scanning assay, we identified several factors that increased actin yield. ATP is required for the actin in crude pea root extracts to bind to immobilized DNase I. Low amounts of ATP are hydrolyzed rapidly by an endogenous ATPase in the extract, and the actin then irreversibly loses the ability to bind to DNase I. High ATP concentrations (5-10 mm) or inhibition of the ATPase (with 10 mm pyrophosphate) are required for pea actin to retain DNase I binding ability. When adequate amounts of ATP are present, actin binding from the extract is further enhanced by basic pH, formamide, and soluble polyvinyl-pyrrolidone. Once actin is bound to the DNase I-agarose and washed free of extract, high ATP concentrations are not required to keep actin bound. Actin eluted from the DNase I-agarose with formamide retained its ability to polymerize into filaments with the addition of KCl and Mg(2+). The advantages and disadvantages of this procedure and its application to other plant materials are discussed.

Identifiers

PMID16653188
PMCPMC1075855
OpenAlexW1980392151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.