Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16651650›Full record

ReviewGenes & development2006

Eukaryotes learn how to count: quorum sensing by yeast.

George F Sprague, Stephen C Winans

Abstract readReviewComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Genes & development, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bio-protection in oenology byFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Review
  2. Review
  3. High-throughput selection of cells based on accumulated growth and division using PicoShell particles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Microorganisms · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Cell-Free Identification of S. cerevisiae Strains by Analysis of Supernatant Using LC-MS.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Synthetic quorum sensing in model microcapsule colonies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Role of quorum sensing in bacterial infections.World journal of clinical cases · 2015
    Review
  17. Core principles of bacterial autoinducer systems.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2015
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

George F SpragueInstitute of Molecular Biology, Department of Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403, USA. gsprague@molbio.uoregon.edu
Stephen C Winans

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AlcoholsGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaIndolesMorphogenesisPhenylethyl AlcoholSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSignal TransductionYeastsAlcoholsIndolesPhenylethyl Alcoholtryptophol

Identifiers

PMID16651650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.