Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16649785›Full record

ArticleLangmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids2006

Exploring the interaction of ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complexes with DNA using single-molecule techniques.

Aleksandra Mihailovic, Ioana Vladescu, Micah McCauley, Elaine Ly, Mark C Williams, Eileen M Spain, Megan E Nuñez

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Protocellular energy transduction, information and fitness.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Binding and stabilizating effect of RNA triplex poly(U)⋅poly(A)*poly(U) by enantiomers of ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complex [Ru(bpy)Journal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aleksandra MihailovicDepartment of Chemistry, Mount Holyoke College, South Hadley, Massachusetts 10075, USA.
Ioana Vladescu
Micah McCauley
Elaine Ly
Mark C Williams
Eileen M Spain
Megan E Nuñez
Mount Holyoke College · USOccidental College · USNortheastern University · US

Funding

Single Molecule HIV-1 Replication InteractionsR01GM072462 · NIGMS · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAMS, MARK C · 2004 to 2018
$3.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-072462NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM072462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we explore DNA binding by a family of ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complexes using an atomic force microscope (AFM) and optical tweezers. We demonstrate using AFM that Ru(bpy)2dppz2+ intercalates into DNA (K(b) = 1.5 x 10(5) M(-1)), as does its close relative Ru(bpy)2dppx2+ (K(b) = 1.5 x 10(5) M(-1)). However, intercalation by Ru(phen)3(2+) and other Ru(II) complexes with K(b) values lower than that of Ru(bpy)2dppz2+ is difficult to determine using AFM because of competing aggregation and surface-binding phenomena. At the high Ru(II) concentrations required to evaluate intercalation, most of the DNA strands acquire a twisted, curled conformation that is impossible to measure accurately. The condensation of DNA on mica in the presence of polycations is well known, but it clearly precludes the accurate assessment by AFM of DNA intercalation by most Ru(II) complexes, though not by ethidium bromide and other monovalent intercalators. When stretching individual DNA molecules using optical tweezers, the same limitation on high metal concentration does not exist. Using optical tweezers, we show that Ru(phen)2dppz2+ intercalates avidly (K(b) = 3.2 x 10(6) M(-1)) whereas Ru(bpy)3(2+) does not intercalate, even at micromolar ruthenium concentrations. Ru(phen)3(2+) is shown to intercalate weakly (i.e., at micromolar concentrations (K(b) = 8.8 x 10(3) M(-1))). The distinct differences in DNA stretching behavior between Ru(phen)3(2+) and Ru(bpy)3(2+) clearly illustrate that intercalation can be distinguished from groove binding by pulling the DNA with optical tweezers. Our results demonstrate both the benefits and challenges of two single-molecule methods of exploring DNA binding and help to elucidate the mode of binding of Ru(phen)3(2+).

Indexed as

DNAMicroscopy, Atomic ForceMolecular StructureOrganometallic CompoundsPyridinesRutheniumStereoisomerismDNAOrganometallic CompoundsPyridinesRuthenium

Identifiers

PMID16649785
PMCPMC2519805
OpenAlexW2020675572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.