Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16649074›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2006

Dedicated calibration formulas permit correction of differences between measurements by different IVUS devices as demonstrated in atherosclerotic human coronary arteries in vitro.

Marc Hartmann, Clemens von Birgelen, Gary S Mintz, Nadine Deppermann, Olaf Dirsch, Martin G Stoel, Gert K van Houwelingen, Hans W Louwerenburg, Patrick M J Verhorst, Raimund Erbel

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Marc HartmannDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcentrum Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Haaksbergerstraat 55, Enschede, 7513, ER, The Netherlands.
Clemens von Birgelen
Gary S Mintz
Nadine Deppermann
Olaf Dirsch
Martin G Stoel
Gert K van Houwelingen
Hans W Louwerenburg
Patrick M J Verhorst
Raimund Erbel
Medisch Spectrum Twente · NLEssen University Hospital · DECardiovascular Research Foundation · USUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) measurements of coronary vessel dimensions are major endpoints of studies focusing on pharmacological interventions, efficiency of drug eluting stents, and vascular remodeling. In serial studies measurement variability among different IVUS devices may cause substantial misinterpretation and error. We analyzed 33 human coronary plaques in vitro using two different IVUS systems (mechanical IVUS system with a 40 MHz Atlantis SR catheter; solid-state electronic IVUS system with a 20 MHz Invision catheter) and repeatedly measured the total vessel, lumen, and plaque + media cross-sectional area and plaque burden (plaque + media area divided by total vessel area). Between the "raw" measurements made by the two devices, there was a significant difference for both plaque + media area (2.35+/-1.86 mm(2), P < 0.01) and plaque burden (5.39+/-3.68%, P < 0.05). Measurements were then corrected by use of recently introduced calibration formulas; as a result the differences decreased significantly for all IVUS parameters measured ( P < 0.0001). After correction, the remaining differences between the corrected mechanical and solid-state IVUS measurements similar to differences between repeated measurements with the same IVUS device (i.e., the intraobserver variability). Thus, in serial studies the use of different IVUS devices at index and follow-up procedure may introduce a substantial error as a result of system-related differences. The application of dedicated calibration formulas allows for correction for these differences by decreasing such differences to the level of intraobserver variability.

Indexed as

AgedCalibrationClinical Trials as TopicCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedIn Vitro TechniquesLinear ModelsMaleObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsResearch DesignUltrasonography, Interventional

Identifiers

PMID16649074
OpenAlexW2043085190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.