Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16648640›Full record

ArticleGenetics2006

Analysis of close stable homolog juxtaposition during meiosis in mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Doris Y Lui, Tamara L Peoples-Holst, Joshua Chang Mell, Hsin-Yen Wu, Eric W Dean, Sean M Burgess

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Diffusion and distal linkages govern interchromosomal dynamics during meiotic prophase.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Meiotic development in Caenorhabditis elegans.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2013
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Prelude to a division.Annual review of cell and developmental biology · 2008
    Review
  12. MPS3 mediates meiotic bouquet formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Doris Y LuiSection of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA.
Tamara L Peoples-Holst
Joshua Chang Mell
Hsin-Yen Wu
Eric W Dean
Sean M Burgess
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

UC Davis MCB T32 Administrative Supplement to Recognize Excellence in Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility (DEIA) MentorshipT32GM007377 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI CHEDIN, FREDERIC LOUIS · 1985 to 2023
$9.9M
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGYT32ES007059 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI Laura S Van Winkle · 1985 to 2026
$7.9M
Homologous Chromosome Pairing in MeiosisR01GM075119 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BURGESS, SEAN M · 2006 to 2020
$4.8M
NIEHS NIH HHS T 32 ES07059NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM075119NIGMS NIH HHS T 32 GM007377-26
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A unique aspect of meiosis is the segregation of homologous chromosomes at the meiosis I division. The pairing of homologous chromosomes is a critical aspect of meiotic prophase I that aids proper disjunction at anaphase I. We have used a site-specific recombination assay in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to examine allelic interaction levels during meiosis in a series of mutants defective in recombination, chromatin structure, or intracellular movement. Red1, a component of the chromosome axis, and Mnd1, a chromosome-binding protein that facilitates interhomolog interaction, are critical for achieving high levels of allelic interaction. Homologous recombination factors (Sae2, Rdh54, Rad54, Rad55, Rad51, Sgs1) aid in varying degrees in promoting allelic interactions, while the Srs2 helicase appears to play no appreciable role. Ris1 (a SWI2/SNF2 related protein) and Dot1 (a histone methyltransferase) appear to play minor roles. Surprisingly, factors involved in microtubule-mediated intracellular movement (Tub3, Dhc1, and Mlp2) appear to play no appreciable role in homolog juxtaposition, unlike their counterparts in fission yeast. Taken together, these results support the notion that meiotic recombination plays a major role in the high levels of homolog interaction observed during budding yeast meiosis.

Indexed as

Meiotic Prophase IRecombination, GeneticAllelesChromatinChromosome BreakageDNA HelicasesDNA RepairDyneinsMicrotubulesModels, GeneticMutationNuclear ProteinsPhenotypeRNA-Binding ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsChromatinDhc1 protein, S pombeDNA HelicasesDyneinsMLP1 protein, S cerevisiaeNuclear ProteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsTub3 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID16648640
PMCPMC1526657
OpenAlexW2090784134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.