Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16648361›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2006

The molecular mechanism of DNA damage recognition by MutS homologs and its consequences for cell death response.

Freddie R Salsbury, Jill E Clodfelter, Michael B Gentry, Thomas Hollis, Karin Drotschmann Scarpinato

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Expression patterns of mismatch repair proteins in cervical cancer uncover independent prognostic value of MSH-2.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. All-atom molecular dynamics comparison of disease-associated zinc fingers.Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics · 2018
    Article
  6. Visualizing correlated motion with HDBSCAN clustering.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. MutSFrontiers in physics · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Freddie R SalsburyDepartment of Physics, Wake Forest University, NC 27109, USA.
Jill E Clodfelter
Michael B Gentry
Thomas Hollis
Karin Drotschmann Scarpinato
Wake Forest University · US

Funding

Repair Proteins: Interface between Cell Death &SurvivalR01CA101829 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SCARPINATO, KARIN D. · 2005 to 2009
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS CA101829NCI NIH HHS R01 CA101829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We determined the molecular mechanism of cell death response by MutS homologs in distinction to the repair event. Key protein-DNA contacts differ in the interaction of MutS homologs with cisplatinated versus mismatched DNA. Mutational analyses of protein-DNA contacts, which were predicted by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, were performed. Mutations in suggested interaction sites can affect repair and cell death response independently, and to different extents. A glutamate residue is identified as the key contact with cisplatin-DNA. Mutation of the residue increases cisplatin resistance due to increased non-specific DNA binding. In contrast, the conserved phenylalanine that is instrumental and indispensable for mismatch recognition during repair is not required for cisplatin cytotoxicity. These differences in protein-DNA interactions are translated into localized conformational changes that affect nucleotide requirements and inter-subunit interactions. Specifically, the ability for ATP binding/hydrolysis has little consequence for the MMR-dependent damage response. As a consequence, intersubunit contacts are altered that most likely affect the interaction with downstream proteins. We here describe the interaction of MutS homologs with DNA damage, as it differs from the interaction with a mismatch, and its structural translation into all other functional regions of the protein as a mechanism to initiate cell death response and concomitantly inhibit repair.

Indexed as

DNA DamageAdenosine TriphosphatasesAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisBinding SitesCisplatinDNA AdductsDNA RepairEscherichia coli ProteinsGlutamic AcidModels, MolecularMutationMutS DNA Mismatch-Binding ProteinMutS Homolog 2 ProteinPhenylalanineProtein Structure, TertiaryAdenosine TriphosphatasesAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatincisplatin-DNA adductDNA AdductsEscherichia coli ProteinsGlutamic AcidMutS DNA Mismatch-Binding ProteinMutS Homolog 2 ProteinMutS protein, E coliPhenylalanine

Identifiers

PMID16648361
PMCPMC1450329
OpenAlexW2080681581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.