Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16648166›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2006

On the accuracy of homology modeling and sequence alignment methods applied to membrane proteins.

Lucy R Forrest, Christopher L Tang, Barry Honig

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed, 244 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. DNA-binding and protein structure of nuclear factors likely acting in genetic information processing in theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. In Silico Structure-Based Vaccine Design.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Review
  10. Modeling of Protein Complexes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  11. Synthesis (ACS omega · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Structure and dynamics of membrane protein in SARS-CoV-2.Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Saturation Mutagenesis of the Transmembrane Region of HokC inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lucy R ForrestHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, USA.
Christopher L Tang
Barry Honig
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we investigate the extent to which techniques for homology modeling that were developed for water-soluble proteins are appropriate for membrane proteins as well. To this end we present an assessment of current strategies for homology modeling of membrane proteins and introduce a benchmark data set of homologous membrane protein structures, called HOMEP. First, we use HOMEP to reveal the relationship between sequence identity and structural similarity in membrane proteins. This analysis indicates that homology modeling is at least as applicable to membrane proteins as it is to water-soluble proteins and that acceptable models (with C alpha-RMSD values to the native of 2 A or less in the transmembrane regions) may be obtained for template sequence identities of 30% or higher if an accurate alignment of the sequences is used. Second, we show that secondary-structure prediction algorithms that were developed for water-soluble proteins perform approximately as well for membrane proteins. Third, we provide a comparison of a set of commonly used sequence alignment algorithms as applied to membrane proteins. We find that high-accuracy alignments of membrane protein sequences can be obtained using state-of-the-art profile-to-profile methods that were developed for water-soluble proteins. Improvements are observed when weights derived from the secondary structure of the query and the template are used in the scoring of the alignment, a result which relies on the accuracy of the secondary-structure prediction of the query sequence. The most accurate alignments were obtained using template profiles constructed with the aid of structural alignments. In contrast, a simple sequence-to-sequence alignment algorithm, using a membrane protein-specific substitution matrix, shows no improvement in alignment accuracy. We suggest that profile-to-profile alignment methods should be adopted to maximize the accuracy of homology models of membrane proteins.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, ProteinAlgorithmsMembrane ProteinsModels, TheoreticalSequence Homology, Amino AcidWaterMembrane ProteinsWater

Identifiers

PMID16648166
PMCPMC1483079
OpenAlexW2093615982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.