ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1991
Antagonism of relaxin by glibenclamide in the uterus of the rat in vivo.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using oral agents to manage gestational diabetes: what have we learned?Current diabetes reports · 2015Review
- Recent advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology of preeclampsia.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2013Article
- The lack of a role for potassium channel opening in the action of relaxin in the rat isolated uterus; a comparison with levcromakalim and salbutamol.British journal of pharmacology · 1996Article
- Cellular localization of the inhibitory action of relaxin against uterine spasm.British journal of pharmacology · 1995Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. The effects of glibenclamide (a blocker of adenosine triphosphate [ATP]-dependent K(+)-channels) on the inhibition of uterine contractions by relaxin, salbutamol and cromakalim were compared in vivo. 2. Glibenclamide (20 mg kg-1) did not antagonize salbutamol. Glibenclamide produced a parallel rightward shift in the dose-response curve to cromakalim with a 5.5 fold decrease in uterine sensitivity (post-vehicle log ID50, -0.87 mg kg-1; post-glibenclamide log ID50, -0.07 mg kg-1). Glibenclamide produced a non-parallel rightward shift in the dose-response curve to relaxin (post-vehicle log ID50, 0.99 microgram kg-1; post-glibenclamide log ID50, 2.28 micrograms kg-1). 3. Glibenclamide reversed established inhibition of uterine contractions by cromakalim or relaxin but not that by salbutamol. 4. Insulin produced no antagonism of relaxin on isolated uterus of the rat, demonstrating that glibenclamide antagonism of relaxin in vivo is not by released insulin. Apamin did not antagonize relaxin in vivo, suggesting that small calcium-activated K(+)-channels are not involved in the action of relaxin. 5. Comparison of the lack of antagonism of salbutamol with the non-competitive-like antagonism of relaxin by glibenclamide suggests that relaxin does not relax uterine smooth muscle predominantly by increasing intracellular adenosine 3', 5'-cyclic monophosphate concentrations. Comparison of the non-competitive-like antagonism of relaxin and the competitive-like antagonism of cromakalim by glibenclamide suggests that the two relaxants may share, in part, a common mechanism of action and that additional mechanism(s) may also be involved in the inhibitory action of relaxin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.