ReviewClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2006
Hymenoptera venom allergens.
Review in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Analysis of the human health threat caused by the red imported fire ant in mainland China.PloS one · 2026Article
- Biomarkers for the Molecular Diagnosis of IgE-Mediated Hymenoptera Venom Allergy in Clinical Practice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Membranous nephropathy after multiple Hymenoptera stings: a case report.CEN case reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Venom Collection by Electrical Stimulation in the Invasive SpeciesMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A combined protein toxin screening based on the transcriptome and proteome of Solenopsis invicta.Proteome science · 2022Article
- Diagnosis of Apis dorsata venom allergy: use of recombinant allergens of Apis mellifera and a passive basophil activation test.Clinical and molecular allergy : CMA · 2022Article
- Venomics of the Central European Myrmicine AntsToxins · 2022Article
- Global View on Ant Venom Allergy: from Allergenic Components to Clinical Management.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2022Review
- Article
- Minimal change disease after multiple wasp stings.Clinical nephrology. Case studies · 2022Article
- A Review of Honeybee Venom Allergens and Allergenicity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Organ-specific transcriptome analysis reveals differential gene expression in different castes under natural conditions in Apis cerana.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Mining the Royal Jelly Proteins: Combinatorial Hexapeptide Ligand Library Significantly Improves the MS-Based Proteomic Identification in Complex Biological Samples.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- An integrated transcriptomic and proteomic approach to identify the main Torymus sinensis venom components.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Article
- An Integrated Proteomic and Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals the Venom Complexity of the Bullet AntToxins · 2020Article
- Transcriptome analysis of life stages of the house cricket, Acheta domesticus, to improve insect crop production.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hymenoptera venoms each contain a variety of protein allergens. The major components have all been characterized, and most of the amino acid sequences are known. This article concentrates on the use of contemporary techniques including cloning, mass spectrometry and genomics in the characterization of venom allergens, and newer separation techniques for protein isolation. Examples of the use of these techniques with venom proteins are presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16645223What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.