Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16645214›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2006

The development of a fluorescence in situ hybridization assay for the detection of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus.

Shannon M Brankley, Kenneth K Wang, Aaron R Harwood, Dylan V Miller, Mona S Legator, Lori S Lutzke, Benjamin R Kipp, Larry E Morrison, Kevin C Halling

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Utility of ancillary studies in the diagnosis and risk assessment of Barrett's esophagus and dysplasia.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Biomarkers.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Covalently deposited dyes: a new chromogen paradigm that facilitates analysis of multiple biomarkers in situ.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2017
    Article
  10. Fluorescence in situ hybridization identifies high risk Barrett's patients likely to develop esophageal adenocarcinoma.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Biomarkers of Barrett's esophagus.World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2014
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Medical and endoscopic management of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2012
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shannon M BrankleyDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN 55902, USA.
Kenneth K Wang
Aaron R Harwood
Dylan V Miller
Mona S Legator
Lori S Lutzke
Benjamin R Kipp
Larry E Morrison
Kevin C Halling
Mayo Clinic · USAbbott (United States) · US

Funding

Biomarkers in Phototherapy of Barrett's EsophagusR01CA097048 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI WANG, KENNETH K · 2002 to 2010
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA097048NCI NIH HHS R0 1 CA97048-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this study was to identify a set of fluorescence in situ hybridization probes for the detection of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett's esophagus. We examined 170 brushing specimens from 138 patients with Barrett's esophagus or a history of Barrett's esophagus using fluorescence in situ hybridization with probes to 5p15, 5q21-22, centromere 7, 7p12, 8q24.12-13, centromere 9, 9p21, centromere 17, 17p13.1, 17q11.2-12, 20q13.2, and centromere Y. Receiver-operator curves were used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of various four-probe combinations for detecting low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia, and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Endoscopic biopsy results were used as the gold standard. Numerous four-probe combinations provided a similarly high sensitivity and specificity. Of these, a set consisting of probes to 8q24, 9p21, 17q11.2, and 20q13.2 was found to have a sensitivity and specificity, respectively, of 70% and 89% for low-grade dysplasia, 84% and 93% for high-grade dysplasia, and 94% and 93% for esophageal adenocarcinoma. This probe set was chosen for future prospective clinical evaluations based on its high sensitivity and specificity, its ability to distinguish adenocarcinoma and high-grade or low-grade dysplasia from lesser diagnostic categories, and the favorable signal quality for each of the probes.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaBarrett EsophagusChromosomes, HumanFemaleHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMaleSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID16645214
PMCPMC1867582
OpenAlexW2117472128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.