ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2006
Establishment and study of different real-time polymerase chain reaction assays for the quantification of cells with deletions of chromosome 7.
Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative genomic hybridization on microarray (a-CGH) in constitutional and acquired mosaicism may detect as low as 8% abnormal cells.Molecular cytogenetics · 2011Article
- Molecular monitoring of residual disease in chronic myeloid leukemia by genomic DNA compared with conventional mRNA analysis.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2009Article
- Monosomy 7 in myeloid malignancies: parental origin and monitoring by real-time quantitative PCR.Leukemia · 2007Article
- Inhibition of cell proliferation, induction of apoptosis, reactivation of DLC1, and modulation of other gene expression by dietary flavone in breast cancer cell lines.Cancer detection and prevention · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The evaluation of residual disease, which has prognostic value in the treatment of hematological malignancies, is currently assessed by scoring a limited number of cells by karyotyping and molecular cytogenetics. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is an easier and more sensitive technique, enables analysis of a larger number of cells, and decreases sampling error. However, real-time PCR has been applied only to target transcripts of fusion genes. Here, we considered two real-time PCR strategies to quantify a number of cells carrying a partial deletion of chromosome 7 mixed with normal disomic cells. The first strategy was based on the amplification of two sequences, one on chromosome 7 and the other on chromosome 14. In the second strategy residual disease was assessed by the ratio between the two alleles of a bi-allelic marker, mapped on chromosome 7, measured with allele-specific assays. Precision and accuracy of the two approaches were tested by reference samples with nominal values of residual disease ranging from 2 to 95%. As expected the second strategy resulted in more precise and accurate monitoring within the range from 5 to 95%. Furthermore, this method may be applied to assess the number of dysplastic or neoplastic clones carrying any unbalanced chromosome changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.