ReviewHuman cell2006
Cloned mice and embryonic stem cell establishment from adult somatic cells.
Review in Human cell, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interspecies nuclear transfer using fibroblasts from leopard, tiger, and lion ear piece collected postmortem as donor cells and rabbit oocytes as recipients.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2016Article
- Interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer: advancements and problems.Cellular reprogramming · 2013Review
- Histocompatible parthenogenetic embryonic stem cells as a potential source for regenerative medicine.Journal of mammalian ova research · 2012Article
- Human therapeutic cloning (NTSC): applying research from mammalian reproductive cloning.Stem cell reviews · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cloning methods are now well described and becoming routine. Yet the frequency at which cloned offspring are produced remains below 2% irrespective of nucleus donor species or cell type. Especially in the mouse, few laboratories can make clones from adult somatic cells, and most mouse strains never succeed to produce cloned mice. On the other hand, nuclear transfer can be used to generate embryonic stem (ntES) cell lines from a patient's own somatic cells. We have shown that ntES cells can be generated relatively easily from a variety of mouse genotypes and cell types of both sexes, even though it may be more difficult to generate clones directly. Several reports have already demonstrated that ntES cells can be used in regenerative medicine in order to rescue immune deficient or infertile phenotypes. However, it is unclear whether ntES cells are identical to fertilized embryonic stem (ES) cells. In general, ntES cell techniques are expected to be applicable to regenerative medicine, however, these techniques can also be used for the preservation of the genetic resources of mouse strains instead of preserving such resources in embryos, oocytes or spermatozoa. This review seeks to describe the phenotype, application, and possible abnormalities of cloned mice and ntES cell lines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16643601What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.