Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16643601›Full record

ReviewHuman cell2006

Cloned mice and embryonic stem cell establishment from adult somatic cells.

Satoshi Kishigami, Sayaka Wakayama, N van Thuan, Teruhiko Wakayama

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Human cell, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Satoshi KishigamiCenter for Developmental Biology RIKEN, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan.
Sayaka Wakayama
N van Thuan
Teruhiko Wakayama

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cloning methods are now well described and becoming routine. Yet the frequency at which cloned offspring are produced remains below 2% irrespective of nucleus donor species or cell type. Especially in the mouse, few laboratories can make clones from adult somatic cells, and most mouse strains never succeed to produce cloned mice. On the other hand, nuclear transfer can be used to generate embryonic stem (ntES) cell lines from a patient's own somatic cells. We have shown that ntES cells can be generated relatively easily from a variety of mouse genotypes and cell types of both sexes, even though it may be more difficult to generate clones directly. Several reports have already demonstrated that ntES cells can be used in regenerative medicine in order to rescue immune deficient or infertile phenotypes. However, it is unclear whether ntES cells are identical to fertilized embryonic stem (ES) cells. In general, ntES cell techniques are expected to be applicable to regenerative medicine, however, these techniques can also be used for the preservation of the genetic resources of mouse strains instead of preserving such resources in embryos, oocytes or spermatozoa. This review seeks to describe the phenotype, application, and possible abnormalities of cloned mice and ntES cell lines.

Indexed as

Cloning, OrganismEmbryonic Stem CellsNuclear Transfer TechniquesAnimalsCell LineCongenital AbnormalitiesFemaleGenetic TechniquesGerm CellsHumansInfertilityMaleMiceMice, Inbred StrainsMice, Mutant StrainsPhenotype

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.