Trial reportJournal of virology2006
Phase I evaluation of intranasal trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine with nontoxigenic Escherichia coli enterotoxin and novel biovector as mucosal adjuvants, using adult volunteers.
Trial report in Journal of virology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative review of antibody response to inactivated seasonal influenza vaccines.Influenza and other respiratory viruses · 2012Pooled it
- Contrasting effects of type I interferon as a mucosal adjuvant for influenza vaccine in mice and humans.Vaccine · 2009Trial
- Fast rise of broadly cross-reactive antibodies after boosting long-lived human memory B cells primed by an MF59 adjuvanted prepandemic vaccine.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009Trial
- Nanotechnology-driven advances in intranasal vaccine delivery systems against infectious diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Maltodextrin-Nanoparticles as a Delivery System for Nasal Vaccines: A Review Article.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Non-Invasive Vaccines: Challenges in Formulation and Vaccine Adjuvants.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- LT-K63 Enhances B Cell Activation and Survival Factors in Neonatal Mice That Translates Into Long-Lived Humoral Immunity.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Article
- Rotavirus vaccine efficacy: current status and areas for improvement.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2019Review
- M2e-tetramer-specific memory CD4 T cells are broadly protective against influenza infection.Mucosal immunology · 2018Article
- Vaccination with Killed but Metabolically ActiveJournal of nature and science · 2017Article
- Current Advances in Virus-Like Particles as a Vaccination Approach against HIV Infection.Vaccines · 2016Review
- Intranasal and oral vaccination with protein-based antigens: advantages, challenges and formulation strategies.Protein & cell · 2015Review
- Influenza vaccines: a moving interdisciplinary field.Viruses · 2014Review
- Chitosan: a promising safe and immune-enhancing adjuvant for intranasal vaccines.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2014Review
- Article
- Formulation and evaluation of carnosic acid nanoparticulate system for upregulation of neurotrophins in the brain upon intranasal administration.Journal of drug targeting · 2013Article
- The adjuvant LT-K63 can restore delayed maturation of follicular dendritic cells and poor persistence of both protein- and polysaccharide-specific antibody-secreting cells in neonatal mice.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2012Article
- Immunogenicity of HIV virus-like particles in rhesus macaques by intranasal administration.Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI · 2012Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Trivalent influenza virus A/Duck/Singapore (H5N3), A/Panama (H3N2), and B/Guandong vaccine preparations were used in a randomized, controlled, dose-ranging phase I study. The vaccines were prepared from highly purified hemagglutinin and neuraminidase from influenza viruses propagated in embryonated chicken eggs and inactivated with formaldehyde. We assigned 100 participants to six vaccine groups, as follows. Three intranasally vaccinated groups received 7.5-microg doses of hemagglutinin from each virus strain with either 3, 10, or 30 microg of heat-labile Escherichia coli enterotoxin (LTK63) and 990 microg of a supramolecular biovector; one intranasally vaccinated group was given 7.5-microg doses of hemagglutinin with 30 microg of LTK63 without the biovector; and another intranasally vaccinated group received saline solution as a placebo. The final group received an intramuscular vaccine containing 15 microg hemagglutinin from each strain with MF59 adjuvant. The immunogenicity of two intranasal doses, delivered by syringe as drops into both nostrils with an interval of 1 week between, was compared with that of two inoculations by intramuscular delivery 3 weeks apart. The intramuscular and intranasal vaccine formulations were both immunogenic but stimulated different limbs of the immune system. The largest increase in circulating antibodies occurred in response to intramuscular vaccination; the largest mucosal immunoglobulin A (IgA) response occurred in response to mucosal vaccination. Current licensing criteria for influenza vaccines in the European Union were satisfied by serum hemagglutination inhibition responses to A/Panama and B/Guandong hemagglutinins given with MF59 adjuvant by injection and to B/Guandong hemagglutinin given intranasally with the highest dose of LTK63 and the biovector. Geometric mean serum antibody titers by hemagglutination inhibition and microneutralization were significantly higher for each virus strain at 3 and 6 weeks in recipients of the intramuscular vaccine than in recipients of the intranasal vaccine. The immunogenicity of the intranasally delivered experimental vaccine varied by influenza virus strain. Mucosal IgA responses to A/Duck/Singapore (H5N3), A/Panama (H3N2), and B/Guandong were highest in participants given 30 microg LTK63 with the biovector, occurring in 7/15 (47%; P=0.0103), 8/15 (53%; P=0.0362), and 14/15 (93%; P=0.0033) participants, respectively, compared to the placebo group. The addition of the biovector to the vaccine given with 30 microg LTK63 enhanced mucosal IgA responses to A/Duck/Singapore (H5N3) (P=0.0491) and B/Guandong (P=0.0028) but not to A/Panama (H3N2). All vaccines were well tolerated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.