Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16641286›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2006

Mice develop effective but delayed protective immune responses when immunized as neonates either intranasally with nonliving VP6/LT(R192G) or orally with live rhesus rotavirus vaccine candidates.

John L VanCott, Anne E Prada, Monica M McNeal, Susan C Stone, Mitali Basu, Bert Huffer, Kristi L Smiley, Mingyuan Shao, Judy A Bean, John D Clements and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. LAPJournal of virology · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Rotavirus infection.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
  10. IL-17A expression in HIV-specific CD8 T cells is regulated by IL-4/IL-13 following HIV-1 prime-boost immunization.Journal of interferon & cytokine research : the official journal of the International Society for Interferon and Cytokine Research · 2015
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Th17 cytokines and vaccine-induced immunity.Seminars in immunopathology · 2010
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Safety and efficacy of neonatal vaccination.European journal of immunology · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

John L VanCottDivision of Infectious Diseases and Biostatistics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
Anne E Prada
Monica M McNeal
Susan C Stone
Mitali Basu
Bert Huffer
Kristi L Smiley
Mingyuan Shao
Judy A Bean
John D Clements
Anthony H-C Choi
Richard L Ward
Office of Infectious Diseases · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USTulane University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rotavirus vaccines are delivered early in life, when the immune system is immature. To determine the effects of immaturity on responses to candidate vaccines, neonatal (7 days old) and adult mice were immunized with single doses of either Escherichia coli-expressed rotavirus VP6 protein and the adjuvant LT(R192G) or live rhesus rotavirus (RRV), and protection against fecal rotavirus shedding following challenge with the murine rotavirus strain EDIM was determined. Neonatal mice immunized intranasally with VP6/LT(R192G) were unprotected at 10 days postimmunization (dpi) and had no detectable rotavirus B-cell (antibody) or CD4(+) CD8(+) T-cell (rotavirus-inducible, Th1 [gamma interferon and interleukin-2 {IL-2}]-, Th2 [IL-5 and IL-4]-, or ThIL-17 [IL-17]-producing spleen cells) responses. However, by 28 and 42 dpi, these mice were significantly (P >or= 0.003) protected and contained memory rotavirus-specific T cells but produced no rotavirus antibody. In contrast, adult mice were nearly fully protected by 10 dpi and contained both rotavirus immunoglobulin G and memory T cells. Neonates immunized orally with RRV were also less protected (P=0.01) than adult mice by 10 dpi and produced correspondingly less rotavirus antibody. Both groups contained few rotavirus-specific memory T cells. Protection levels by 28 dpi for neonates or adults were equal, as were rotavirus antibody levels. This report introduces a neonatal mouse model for active protection studies with rotavirus vaccines. It indicates that, with time, neonatal mice develop full protection after intranasal immunization with VP6/LT(R192G) or oral immunization with a live heterologous rotavirus and supports reports that protection depends on CD4(+) T cells or antibody, respectively.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAdministration, IntranasalAdministration, OralAnimalsAnimals, NewbornAntigens, ViralBacterial ToxinsCapsid ProteinsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCells, CulturedEnterotoxinsEscherichia coli ProteinsFemaleMiceMice, Inbred BALB CAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntigens, ViralBacterial ToxinsCapsid ProteinsEnterotoxinsEscherichia coli Proteinsheat-labile enterotoxin, E colirhesus rotavirus vaccineRotavirus VaccinesVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, InactivatedVP6 protein, Rotavirus

Identifiers

PMID16641286
PMCPMC1472046
OpenAlexW2140868912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.