Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16641230›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2006

Preconditioning doses of NMDA promote neuroprotection by enhancing neuronal excitability.

Francesc X Soriano, Sofia Papadia, Frank Hofmann, Neil R Hardingham, Hilmar Bading, Giles E Hardingham

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 114 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
114citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

114 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 235 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Memantine has a nicotinic neuroprotective pathway in acute hippocampal slices after an NMDA insult.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. A Rationale for Hypoxic and Chemical Conditioning in Huntington's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francesc X SorianoCentre for Neuroscience Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 1QH, United Kingdom.
Sofia Papadia
Frank Hofmann
Neil R Hardingham
Hilmar Bading
Giles E Hardingham
University of Edinburgh · GBCardiff University · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 078178
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroprotection can be induced by low doses of NMDA, which activate both synaptic and extrasynaptic NMDA receptors. This is in apparent contradiction with our recent findings that extrasynaptic NMDA receptor signaling exerts a dominant inhibitory effect on prosurvival signaling from synaptic NMDA receptors. Here we report that exposure to low preconditioning doses of NMDA results in preferential activation of synaptic NMDA receptors because of a dramatic increase in action potential firing. Both acute and long-lasting phases of neuroprotection in the face of apoptotic or excitotoxic insults are dependent on this firing enhancement. Key mediators of synaptic NMDA receptor-dependent neuroprotection, phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase-Akt (PI3 kinase-Akt) signaling to Forkhead box subgroup O (FOXO) export and glycogen synthase kinase 3beta (GSK3beta) inhibition and cAMP response element-binding protein-dependent (CREB-dependent) activation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), can be induced only by low doses of NMDA via this action potential-dependent route. In contrast, NMDA doses on the other side of the toxicity threshold do not favor synaptic NMDA receptor activation because they strongly suppress firing rates below baseline. The classic bell-shaped curve depicting neuronal fate in response to NMDA dose can be viewed as the net effect of two antagonizing (synaptic vs extrasynaptic) curves: via increased firing the synaptic signaling dominates at low doses, whereas firing becomes suppressed and extrasynaptic signaling dominates as the toxicity threshold is crossed.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsApoptosisCells, CulturedCell SurvivalDose-Response Relationship, DrugHippocampusNeuronsNeuroprotective AgentsN-MethylaspartateRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateSynaptic TransmissionNeuroprotective AgentsN-MethylaspartateReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID16641230
PMCPMC2561857
OpenAlexW2141750111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.