Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16640780›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2006

A qualitative study in rural and urban areas on whether--and how--to consult during routine and out of hours.

Neil C Campbell, Lisa Iversen, Jane Farmer, Clare Guest, John MacDonald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Why Do People Choose Emergency and Urgent Care Services? A Rapid Review Utilizing a Systematic Literature Search and Narrative Synthesis.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Understanding access to general practice through the lens of candidacy: a critical review of the literature.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Reconceptualising Rural Cancer Inequalities: Time for a New Research Agenda.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Validation of a new measure of availability and accommodation of health care that is valid for rural and urban contexts.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Factors influencing professional decision making on unplanned hospital admission: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
    Article
  15. Monitoring access to out-of-hours care services in Scotland - a review.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2011
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Neil C CampbellDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill Health Centre, Westburn Road, Aberdeen, AB25 2AY, UK. n.campbell@abdn.ac.uk
Lisa Iversen
Jane Farmer
Clare Guest
John MacDonald

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients vary widely when making decisions to consult primary care. Some present frequently with trivial illness: others delay with serious disease. Differences in health service provision may play a part in this. We aimed to explore whether and how patients' consulting intentions take account of their perceptions of health service provision.

methodsFour focus groups and 51 semi-structured interviews with 78 participants (45 to 64 years) in eight urban and rural general practices in Northeast and Southwest Scotland. We used vignettes to stimulate discussion about what to do and why. Inductive analysis identified themes and explored the influence of their perceptions of health service provision on decision-making processes.

resultsAnticipated waiting times for appointments affected consulting intentions, especially when the severity of symptoms was uncertain. Strategies were used to deal with this, however: in cities, these included booking early just in case, being assertive, demanding visits, or calling out-of-hours; in rural areas, participants used relationships with primary care staff, and believed that being perceived as undemanding was advantageous. Out-of-hours, decisions to consult were influenced by opinions regarding out-of-hours services. Some preferred to attend nearby emergency departments or call 999. In rural areas, participants tended to delay until their own doctor was available, or might contact them even when not on call.

conclusionPerceived barriers to health service access affect decisions to consult, but some patients develop strategies to get round them. Current changes in UK primary care are unlikely to reduce differences in consulting behaviour and may increase delays by some patients, especially in rural areas.

Indexed as

After-Hours CareDecision MakingFamily PracticeFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareQualitative ResearchRural Health ServicesScotlandSurveys and QuestionnairesUrban Health Services

Identifiers

PMID16640780
PMCPMC1523347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.