Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16640723›Full record

ArticleInsect molecular biology2006

High efficiency site-specific genetic engineering of the mosquito genome.

D D Nimmo, L Alphey, J M Meredith, P Eggleston

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insect molecular biology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 155 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. History of Mosquito Transgenesis: A Perspective in Review.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Optimizing CRE and PhiC31 mediated recombination inFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Making of TransgenicMethods and protocols · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Gene Drive for Mosquito Control: Where Did It Come from and Where Are We Headed?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D D NimmoCentre for Applied Entomology and Parasitology, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire UK.
L Alphey
J M Meredith
P Eggleston
Keele University · GBOxitec (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 056146Wellcome Trust 069162Wellcome Trust 077593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current techniques for the genetic engineering of insect genomes utilize transposable genetic elements, which are inefficient, have limited carrying capacity and give rise to position effects and insertional mutagenesis. As an alternative, we investigated two site-specific integration mechanisms in the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti. One was a modified CRE/lox system from phage P1 and the other a viral integrase system from Streptomyces phage phi C31. The modified CRE/lox system consistently failed to produce stable germline transformants but the phi C31 system was highly successful, increasing integration efficiency by up to 7.9-fold. The ability to efficiently target transgenes to specific chromosomal locations and the potential to integrate very large transgenes has broad applicability to research on many medically and economically important species.

Indexed as

Genome, InsectAedesAnimalsBacteriophagesGene TargetingGenetic EngineeringGenetic VectorsIntegrasesTransduction, GeneticViral ProteinsVirus IntegrationCre recombinaseIntegrasesViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID16640723
PMCPMC1602059
OpenAlexW1998440717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.