ReviewDialogues in clinical neuroscience2006
The German Research Network on Schizophrenia--impact on the management of schizophrenia.
Review in Dialogues in clinical neuroscience, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Benefits, Challenges, and Strategies toward Establishing a Community-Engaged Knowledge Hub: An Integrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Pooled it
- The decoupling of structural and functional connectivity of auditory networks in individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis.The world journal of biological psychiatry : the official journal of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry · 2023Article
- Cellular and extracellular white matter alterations indicate conversion to psychosis among individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis.The world journal of biological psychiatry : the official journal of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry · 2021Article
- Sex-Related Differences in White Matter Asymmetry and Its Implications for Verbal Working Memory in Psychosis High-Risk State.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- Evidence for Distinguishable Treatment Costs among Paranoid Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective Disorder.PloS one · 2016Article
- EEG-Informed fMRI Reveals a Disturbed Gamma-Band-Specific Network in Subjects at High Risk for Psychosis.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2016Article
- Shades of vulnerability: latent structures of clinical caseness in prodromal and early phases of schizophrenia.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2014Article
- Neurophysiological correlates of impaired facial affect recognition in individuals at risk for schizophrenia.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The German Research Network On Schizophrenia (GRNS) is a nationwide network currently comprising 16 psychiatric university departments and 14 state and district hospitals, as well as six local networks of psychiatric practices and general practitioners collaborating on about 25 interrelated, multicenter projects on schizophrenia research. The GRNS aims to intensify collaboration and knowledge exchange between leading research institutions and qualified routine care facilities, both within (horizontal network) and between (vertical network) the two levels of research and care, in order to create the scientific preconditions for optimization of the management of schizophrenia. The concept and the first results of studies aiming at the investigation of (i) strategies for early detection and early intervention in the prodromal stage of psychosis; (ii) treatment in first-episode schizophrenia; (iii) quality management; and (iv) destigmatization, are described as examples of this effort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16640122PMC3181752What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.