Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16639500›Full record

ReviewExperimental brain research2006

Parkinson's disease: a rethink of rodent models.

Heather L Melrose, Sarah J Lincoln, Glenn M Tyndall, Matthew J Farrer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental brain research, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Adult neurogenesis in Parkinson's disease.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2013
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Oxidative stress in genetic mouse models of Parkinson's disease.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2012
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The genetics of Parkinson disease.Journal of geriatric psychiatry and neurology · 2010
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Heather L MelroseDepartment of Neuroscience, Genetics of Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, Morris K. Udall Parkinson' Disease Research Center of Excellence, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
Sarah J Lincoln
Glenn M Tyndall
Matthew J Farrer
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

MORRIS K. UDALL PARKINSONS DISEASE RESEARCH CENTER OF EXP01NS040256 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC COLL OF MED, JACKSONVILLE · PI DICKSON, DENNIS WILLIAM · 1999 to 2003
$5.2M
NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS40256
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a multifactorial disease with a complex etiology that results from genetic risk factors, environmental exposures and most likely a combination of both. Rodent models of parkinsonism aim to reproduce key pathogenic features of the syndrome including movement disorder induced by the progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra, accompanied by the formation of alpha-synuclein containing Lewy body inclusions. Despite the creation of many excellent models, both chemically induced and genetically engineered, there is none that accurately demonstrates these features. Recent pathological staging studies in man have also emphasized the significant non-CNS component of PD that has yet to be tackled. Herein, we summarize rodent models of PD and what they offer to the field, and suggest future challenges and opportunities.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalGenes, DominantGenes, RecessiveMiceNeurotoxinsParkinson Disease, SecondaryRatsNeurotoxins

Identifiers

PMID16639500
OpenAlexW1991973409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.