Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16639318›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgery2006

Predictors of neurocognitive decline after carotid endarterectomy.

J Mocco, David A Wilson, Ricardo J Komotar, Joseph Zurica, William J Mack, Hadi J Halazun, Raheleh Hatami, Robert R Sciacca, E Sander Connolly, Eric J Heyer

Expression of concern Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgery, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. It is linked to trial NCT02808754 (Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for Carotid Endarterectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02808754 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for Carotid Endarterectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2016 to 2019Enrolled86ConditionsCarotid Stenosis, Endarterectomy, CarotidArmsRemote Ischemic Preconditioning
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genetic Polymorphisms Influence Cognition in Patients Undergoing Carotid Interventions.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2016
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Reduced middle cerebral artery velocity during cross-clamp predicts cognitive dysfunction after carotid endarterectomy.Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2014
    Observational
  17. Apolipoprotein E-ε4 polymorphism and cognitive dysfunction after carotid endarterectomy.Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2014
    Observational
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J MoccoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, USA.
David A Wilson
Ricardo J Komotar
Joseph Zurica
William J Mack
Hadi J Halazun
Raheleh Hatami
Robert R Sciacca
E Sander Connolly
Eric J Heyer
Columbia University · USNeurological Surgery · US

Funding

Neuropsychological Outcome of Carotid EndarterectomyR01AG017604 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HEYER, ERIC JOHN · 2001 to 2012
$3.2M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG017604NIA NIH HHS R01 AG17604-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlthough the incidence of stroke after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is low (1-3%), approximately 25% of patients experience subtle declines in postoperative neuropsychometric function. No studies have investigated the risk factors for this neurocognitive change. We sought to identify predictors of postoperative neurocognitive dysfunction.

methodsWe enrolled 186 CEA patients, with both symptomatic and asymptomatic stenosis, to undergo a battery of neuropsychometric tests preoperatively and on postoperative Days 1 and 30. Neurocognitive dysfunction was defined as a two standard deviation decline in performance compared with a similarly aged control group of lumbar laminectomy patients. Univariate logistic regression was performed for age, sex, obesity, smoking, symptomatology, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, use of statin medication, previous myocardial infarction, previous CEA, operative side, duration of surgery, duration of carotid cross-clamp, and weight-adjusted doses of midazolam and fentanyl. Variables achieving univariate P < 0.10 were included in a multivariate analysis. Data is presented as (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, P-value).

resultsEighteen and 9% of CEA patients were injured on postoperative Days 1 and 30, respectively. Advanced age predicted neurocognitive dysfunction on Days 1 and 30 (1.93 per decade, 1.15-3.25, 0.01; and 2.57 per decade, 1.01-6.51, 0.049, respectively). Additionally, diabetes independently predicted injury on Day 30 (4.26, 1.15-15.79, 0.03).

conclusionsAdvanced age and diabetes predispose to neurocognitive dysfunction after CEA. These results are consistent with risk factors for neurocognitive dysfunction after coronary bypass and major stroke after CEA, supporting an underlying ischemic pathophysiology. Further work is necessary to determine the role these neurocognitive deficits may play in appropriately selecting patients for CEA.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCarotid StenosisCognition DisordersEndarterectomy, CarotidFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPredictive Value of TestsRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID16639318
PMCPMC2562551
OpenAlexW2010797126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.