Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16638784›Full record

ArticleArchives of disease in childhood2006

Impact of adverse publicity on MMR vaccine uptake: a population based analysis of vaccine uptake records for one million children, born 1987-2004.

V Friederichs, J C Cameron, C Robertson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of disease in childhood, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. "Publish or Perish"; time to question an age old adage?The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. MMR: where are we now?Archives of disease in childhood · 2007
    Review
  14. Childhood immunisation: what is the future?Archives of disease in childhood · 2007
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

V FriederichsHealth Protection Scotland, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
J C Cameron
C Robertson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo determine the impact of adverse publicity on MMR uptake and measles susceptibility, including whether vaccination is delayed and the role of deprivation.

methodsA population database for all Scotland containing immunisation records for over one million children (n = 1,079,327) born 1987-2004 was analysed. MMR uptake was determined by birth cohort and deprivation category. "Final" uptake (at approx age 6 years) was predicted by linear regression by birth cohort. Measles susceptibility in 1998 and 2003 was determined by postcode sector and district for cohorts combined to construct nursery and primary school age groups.

resultsThere is evidence of a slight rise in late uptake, but insufficient to compensate for underlying declines. Late vaccination continues to be associated with deprivation, while the most affluent tend to be vaccinated promptly, or not at all. Predicted figures for "final" MMR1 uptake are over 90%, but under 95%. Measles susceptibility has increased significantly in nursery children, with an eightfold rise in the number of districts with greater than 20% susceptibility in this group (from 3 to 25).

conclusionsIncreased measles susceptibility in nursery children is concerning, particularly in the most vulnerable areas. These figures are likely to increase in the future, as MMR uptake has not yet returned to the previous higher level. Increased susceptibility levels can also be expected in primary schools in the future, as levels of late uptake are insufficient to compensate. Predicted figures for "final" MMR1 uptake are under the herd immunity threshold and campaigns may be required to increase uptake among future primary school children.

Indexed as

ParentsChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesCommunications MediaDisease OutbreaksHumansImmunization ProgramsImmunization ScheduleIncidenceInfantMeaslesMeasles-Mumps-Rubella VaccineMumpsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePublic RelationsRubella Syndrome, CongenitalMeasles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID16638784
PMCPMC2082791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.