A taxonomy of general practice.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Understanding access to general practice through the lens of candidacy: a critical review of the literature.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
   Review
2. Purposeful SDM: A problem-based approach to caring for patients with shared decision making.Patient education and counseling · 2019
   Article
3. Understanding "revolving door" patients in general practice: a qualitative study.BMC family practice · 2014
   Article
4. Psychiatric comorbidity among terminally ill patients in general practice in the Netherlands: a comparison between patients with cancer and heart failure.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013
   Article
5. Textual practices in crafting bioethics cases.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2012
   Article
6. A taxonomy of general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2006
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  A taxonomy of general practice.2006

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as