ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2006
Sex inequalities in access to care for patients with diabetes in primary care: questionnaire survey.
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- The equity dimension in evaluations of the quality and outcomes framework: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2011Pooled it
- Development and Validation of an Index to Measure and Quantify Pet-Related Barriers to Healthcare Access and Utilization.Anthrozoos · 2025Article
- COVID-19 pandemic-related healthcare interruptions and diabetes distress: a national study of US adults with diabetes.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Predictors of unmet needs among people with diabetes mellitus type 2 in Gampaha district of Sri Lanka.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Gender and Physical Activity: What We Can Learn from The Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion?Journal of lifestyle medicine · 2023Review
- The construct validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D, SF-6D and Diabetes Health Profile-18 in type 2 diabetes.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2014Article
- An evaluation of gender equity in different models of primary care practices in Ontario.BMC public health · 2010Article
- The influence of gender on the primary care management of diabetes in Tunisia.The Pan African medical journal · 2009Article
- Hospital quality: a PRIDIT approach.Health services research · 2008Article
- Sex inequalities.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealth experiences differ between men and women. The health services have focused their attention on gynaecological health problems in women, however women with non-gynaecological health problems could be unintentionally neglected. Given the increased prevalence of diabetes, the healthcare needs and experiences of women with diabetes are increasing.
aimTo determine the extent of sex inequalities in access to care for diabetes in primary care. DESIGN OF STUDY: Cross-sectional population-based questionnaire study.
settingTwenty-three general practices spread through 23 different primary care trusts in the former Trent Region, UK.
methodThe study consisted of a random sample of 1,673 patients with diabetes. Outcomes measured were odds ratios adjusted for age for measures of physical access to the GP's surgery; ease of obtaining appointments; access to primary care professionals; levels of routine diabetes care received; barriers to physical activity, problems eating and psychological distress as measured by the 18 score Diabetes Health Profile.
resultsWomen were less likely than men to report that they had talked to their GP or practice nurse about their diabetes in the previous 12 months and were less likely to report that they were able to book routine appointments at convenient times. Almost 40% of all patients with diabetes reported difficulty in visiting the GP's surgery for their diabetes care, and women were more likely to report difficulties in visiting the surgery than men. Women were more likely than men to be afraid to go out alone (7.9% versus 3.6%) and more likely to be housebound (6.8% versus 2.4%). Women had significantly higher scores for eating problems and barriers to physical activity than men.
conclusionsWomen report more problems with access to diabetes care than men. If the ambitions of the National Service Framework are to be met, then positive action needs to be taken to improve access to care for women with diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16638249PMC1837842W1753252193What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.