Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16638249›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2006

Sex inequalities in access to care for patients with diabetes in primary care: questionnaire survey.

Julia Hippisley-Cox, Janet Yates, Mike Pringle, Carol Coupland, Vicky Hammersley

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Hospital quality: a PRIDIT approach.Health services research · 2008
    Article
  10. Sex inequalities.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2006
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julia Hippisley-CoxDivision of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham. julia.hippisley-cox@nottingham.ac.uk
Janet Yates
Mike Pringle
Carol Coupland
Vicky Hammersley
University of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth experiences differ between men and women. The health services have focused their attention on gynaecological health problems in women, however women with non-gynaecological health problems could be unintentionally neglected. Given the increased prevalence of diabetes, the healthcare needs and experiences of women with diabetes are increasing.

aimTo determine the extent of sex inequalities in access to care for diabetes in primary care. DESIGN OF STUDY: Cross-sectional population-based questionnaire study.

settingTwenty-three general practices spread through 23 different primary care trusts in the former Trent Region, UK.

methodThe study consisted of a random sample of 1,673 patients with diabetes. Outcomes measured were odds ratios adjusted for age for measures of physical access to the GP's surgery; ease of obtaining appointments; access to primary care professionals; levels of routine diabetes care received; barriers to physical activity, problems eating and psychological distress as measured by the 18 score Diabetes Health Profile.

resultsWomen were less likely than men to report that they had talked to their GP or practice nurse about their diabetes in the previous 12 months and were less likely to report that they were able to book routine appointments at convenient times. Almost 40% of all patients with diabetes reported difficulty in visiting the GP's surgery for their diabetes care, and women were more likely to report difficulties in visiting the surgery than men. Women were more likely than men to be afraid to go out alone (7.9% versus 3.6%) and more likely to be housebound (6.8% versus 2.4%). Women had significantly higher scores for eating problems and barriers to physical activity than men.

conclusionsWomen report more problems with access to diabetes care than men. If the ambitions of the National Service Framework are to be met, then positive action needs to be taken to improve access to care for women with diabetes.

Indexed as

Women's HealthAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes MellitusFamily PracticeFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of Health CareSex FactorsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID16638249
PMCPMC1837842
OpenAlexW1753252193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.