Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16637868›Full record

ReviewJournal of anatomy2006

Early effects of embryonic movement: 'a shot out of the dark'.

Andrew A Pitsillides

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of anatomy, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mechanical StimulationFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Single-transcript multiplexWellcome open research · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Nuclear FGFR2 regulates musculoskeletal integration within the developing limb.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The mechanical impact ofPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  13. Embryo movements regulate tendon mechanical property development.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A Chick Embryo in-Vitro Model of Knee Morphogenesis.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew A PitsillidesDepartment of Veterinary Basic Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, London, UK. apitsill@rvc.ac.uk
Royal Veterinary College · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has long been appreciated that studying the embryonic chick in ovo provides a variety of advantages, including the potential to control the embryo's environment and its movement independently of maternal influences. This allowed early workers to identify movement as a pivotal factor in the development of the locomotor apparatus. With an increasing focus on the earliest detectable movements, we have exploited this system by developing novel models and schemes to examine the influence of defined periods of movement during musculoskeletal development. Utilizing drugs with known neuromuscular actions to provoke hyperactivity (4-aminopyridine, AP) and either rigid (decamethonium bromide, DMB) or flaccid (pancuronium bromide, PB) paralysis, we have examined the role of movement in joint, osteochondral and muscle development. Our initial studies focusing on the joint showed that AP-induced hyperactivity had little, if any, effect on the timing or scope of joint cavity elaboration, suggesting that endogenous activity levels provide sufficient stimulus, and additional mobilization is without effect. By contrast, imposition of either rigid or flaccid paralysis prior to cavity formation completely blocked this process and, with time, produced fusion of cartilaginous elements and formation of continuous single cartilaginous rods across locations where joints would ordinarily form. The effect of these distinct forms of paralysis differed, however, when treatment was initiated after formation of an overt cavity; rigid, but not flaccid, paralysis partly conserved precavitated joints. This observation suggests that 'static' loading derived from 'spastic' rigidity can act to preserve joint cavities. Another facet of these studies was the observation that DMB-induced rigid paralysis produces a uniform and specific pattern of limb deformity whereas PB generated a diverse range of fixed positional deformities. Both also reduced limb growth, with different developmental periods preferentially modifying specific osteochondral components. Changes in cartilage and bone growth induced by 3-day periods of flaccid immobilization, imposed at distinct developmental phases, provides support for a diminution in cartilage elaboration at an early phase and for a relatively delayed influence of movement on osteogenesis, invoking critical periods during which the developing skeleton becomes receptive to the impact of movement. Immobilization also exerts differential impact along the proximo-distal axis of the limb. Finally, our preliminary results support the possibility that embryonic hyperactivity influences the potential for postnatal muscle growth.

Indexed as

4-AminopyridineAnimalsBone DevelopmentCartilage, ArticularChick EmbryoCongenital AbnormalitiesDecamethonium CompoundsEmbryo, MammalianHumansJointsMovementMusculoskeletal DevelopmentNeuromuscular Blocking AgentsPancuroniumParalysisPotassium Channel Blockers4-AminopyridinedecamethoniumDecamethonium CompoundsNeuromuscular Blocking AgentsPancuroniumPotassium Channel Blockers

Identifiers

PMID16637868
PMCPMC2100206
OpenAlexW2040785797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.