ReviewJournal of anatomy2006
Early effects of embryonic movement: 'a shot out of the dark'.
Review in Journal of anatomy, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immobilization secondary to cell death of muscle precursors with a dual transcriptional signature contributes to the emu wing skeletal pattern.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Building a Co-ordinated Musculoskeletal System: The Plasticity of the Developing Skeleton in Response to Muscle Contractions.Advances in anatomy, embryology, and cell biology · 2023Article
- Embryo movement is more frequent in avian brood parasites than birds with parental reproductive strategies.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021Article
- Identification of qPCR reference genes suitable for normalising gene expression in the developing mouse embryo.Wellcome open research · 2021Article
- Mechanical StimulationFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Baby steps towards linking calcaneal trabecular bone ontogeny and the development of bipedal human gait.Journal of anatomy · 2020Article
- Single-transcript multiplexWellcome open research · 2020Article
- Design of a Bioreactor to Assess the Effect of Passive Joint Loading in a Live Chick EmbryoTissue engineering. Part C, Methods · 2019Article
- Nuclear FGFR2 regulates musculoskeletal integration within the developing limb.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2019Article
- Molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying the evolution of form and function in the amniote jaw.EvoDevo · 2019Review
- FGF and TGFβ signaling link form and function during jaw development and evolution.Developmental biology · 2018Article
- The mechanical impact ofPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018Article
- Embryo movements regulate tendon mechanical property development.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018Article
- Article
- The chemokines CXCL12 and CXCL14 differentially regulate connective tissue markers during limb development.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- The role of embryo movement in the development of the furcula.Journal of anatomy · 2017Article
- Limb proportions show developmental plasticity in response to embryo movement.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Differential effects of altered patterns of movement and strain on joint cell behaviour and skeletal morphogenesis.Osteoarthritis and cartilage · 2016Article
- Trabecular bone of precocials at birth; Are they prepared to run for the wolf(f)?Journal of morphology · 2016Article
- A Chick Embryo in-Vitro Model of Knee Morphogenesis.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
It has long been appreciated that studying the embryonic chick in ovo provides a variety of advantages, including the potential to control the embryo's environment and its movement independently of maternal influences. This allowed early workers to identify movement as a pivotal factor in the development of the locomotor apparatus. With an increasing focus on the earliest detectable movements, we have exploited this system by developing novel models and schemes to examine the influence of defined periods of movement during musculoskeletal development. Utilizing drugs with known neuromuscular actions to provoke hyperactivity (4-aminopyridine, AP) and either rigid (decamethonium bromide, DMB) or flaccid (pancuronium bromide, PB) paralysis, we have examined the role of movement in joint, osteochondral and muscle development. Our initial studies focusing on the joint showed that AP-induced hyperactivity had little, if any, effect on the timing or scope of joint cavity elaboration, suggesting that endogenous activity levels provide sufficient stimulus, and additional mobilization is without effect. By contrast, imposition of either rigid or flaccid paralysis prior to cavity formation completely blocked this process and, with time, produced fusion of cartilaginous elements and formation of continuous single cartilaginous rods across locations where joints would ordinarily form. The effect of these distinct forms of paralysis differed, however, when treatment was initiated after formation of an overt cavity; rigid, but not flaccid, paralysis partly conserved precavitated joints. This observation suggests that 'static' loading derived from 'spastic' rigidity can act to preserve joint cavities. Another facet of these studies was the observation that DMB-induced rigid paralysis produces a uniform and specific pattern of limb deformity whereas PB generated a diverse range of fixed positional deformities. Both also reduced limb growth, with different developmental periods preferentially modifying specific osteochondral components. Changes in cartilage and bone growth induced by 3-day periods of flaccid immobilization, imposed at distinct developmental phases, provides support for a diminution in cartilage elaboration at an early phase and for a relatively delayed influence of movement on osteogenesis, invoking critical periods during which the developing skeleton becomes receptive to the impact of movement. Immobilization also exerts differential impact along the proximo-distal axis of the limb. Finally, our preliminary results support the possibility that embryonic hyperactivity influences the potential for postnatal muscle growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.