Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16636708›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2006

An evaluation of a collaborative model for preparing evidence-based medicine teachers.

Carol S Scherrer, Josephine L Dorsch, Ann C Weller

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Hospital librarians' perceptions related to evidence-based health care.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2008
    Article
  7. Evaluation of a train-the-trainer program for tobacco cessation.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carol S ScherrerUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, Library of the Health Sciences, 1750 West Polk m/c 763, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA. cscherre@uic.edu
Josephine L Dorsch
Ann C Weller

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe authors studied the effectiveness of a train-the-trainer collaboration model between librarians and medical faculty to instruct librarians and health professionals in teaching evidence-based medicine (EBM) principles.

methodsA telephone survey was administered to graduates of an EBM course who agreed to participate in the study. They were asked if and how they taught EBM on returning to their institutions, if they felt competent to critically appraise an article, if their skill in searching PubMed improved, and if they collaborated with others in teaching EBM.

resultsMost respondents were librarians. The class was successful in that most taught EBM on return to their home institutions. Most initiated collaboration with health professionals. The goals of improving PubMed searching and achieving statistical competency had less success.

conclusionThis model is effective in preparing librarians to teach EBM. Modeling and encouraging collaboration between librarians and health professionals were successful techniques. Librarians would like more instruction in statistical concepts and less in searching PubMed. conclusions cannot be made for health professionals because of the low response rate from this group. As evidence-based health care continues to extend to other disciplines, librarians can position themselves to participate fully in the EBM educational process.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorModels, EducationalConsumer BehaviorCredentialingEducational StatusEducation, Medical, ContinuingEvidence-Based MedicineFaculty, MedicalHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansIllinoisInformation Storage and RetrievalLibrary Science

Identifiers

PMID16636708
PMCPMC1435859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.