ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2006
A yeast assay probes the interaction between botulinum neurotoxin serotype B and its SNARE substrate.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Construction of a Yeast Cell-Based Assay System to Analyze SNAP25-Targeting Botulinum Neurotoxins.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Roles of Asp179 and Glu270 in ADP-Ribosylation of Actin by Clostridium perfringens Iota Toxin.PloS one · 2015Article
- The blockade of the neurotransmitter release apparatus by botulinum neurotoxins.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2014Review
- Review
- Clostridial neurotoxins: mechanism of SNARE cleavage and outlook on potential substrate specificity reengineering.Toxins · 2010Review
- Catalytic properties of botulinum neurotoxin subtypes A3 and A4.Biochemistry · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The seven functionally distinct serotypes (A-G) of botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) are dichains consisting of light chain (LC) with zinc-dependent endoprotease activity connected by one disulfide bond to heavy chain with neuronal-cell translocation and receptor-binding domains. LC-mediated proteolysis of soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) proteins and consequent inhibition of synaptic vesicle fusion to the presynaptic membrane of human motor neurons are responsible for flaccid paralysis associated with botulism. LC endoproteolysis is complex, requiring highly extended SNARE sequences at the surface of intracellular membranes and prompting our development of a genetically amenable assay to monitor the interaction between BoNT/LC and its SNARE substrate. Using BoNT serotype B as a model, the assay employs a chimeric SNARE protein where a portion of neuronal synaptobrevin (Sb) is fused to Snc2p, a Sb ortholog required for protein secretion from yeast cells. Regulated expression of serotype B-LC in yeast leads to cleavage of the chimera and a conditional growth defect. To assess utility of this assay for monitoring SNARE protein cleavage, we growth-selected chimeric SNARE mutations that inhibited proteolysis. When these mutations were introduced into Sb and examined for cleavage, substrate residues located near and distal to the cleavage site were important, including residues positioned near the Sb transmembrane domain, an unexplored aspect of BoNT cell intoxication. Additional mutations were positioned in a nine-residue SNARE motif, supporting a previously assigned role for this motif in LC recognition and providing proof of principle for the application of yeast-based technology to study intracellular BoNT/LC endoproteases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.