Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16633750›Full record

ArticleSurgery today2006

Effect of peritoneal lavage with taurolidine on primary colonic anastomosis in a rat model of secondary peritonitis.

Aşkin Akkuş, Mustafa Gülmen, Ayhan Cevik, Nejdet Bildik, Orhan Sad, Erdem Oztürk, Nagihan Ozdemir Barişik

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery today, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aşkin AkkuşSecond Surgery Clinic, Dr. Lütfi Kirdar Education and Research Hospital, Kartal, 34865, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mustafa Gülmen
Ayhan Cevik
Nejdet Bildik
Orhan Sad
Erdem Oztürk
Nagihan Ozdemir Barişik
Dr Lütfi Kırdar Kartal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe reported antibacterial, antiendotoxic, and antiadhesive effects of taurolidine prompted us to study the benefits of intraperitoneal lavage with taurolidine on primary colonic anastomosis in a rat model of secondary peritonitis.

methodsWe induced peritonitis in 40 rats by injecting Escherichia coli isolate intraperitoneally. We performed colonic resection and primary anastomosis 5 h later, after lavage with either taurolidine or saline solution. After the rats were killed, on postoperative day (POD) 3 (n = 10) or 7 (n = 10), we measured the bursting pressures and hydroxyproline levels, then examined the resected specimens histologically.

resultsBursting pressures and tissue hydroxyproline levels were significantly higher in the taurolidine group than in the control group on PODs 3 and 7 (P < 0.05). Histopathological examination revealed significantly higher fibroblastic activity in the taurolidine group.

conclusionsThe higher bursting pressures and tissue hydroxyproline levels in the rats given taurolidine showed the positive effect of taurolidine on anastomotic strength in secondary peritonitis. Taurolidine is a novel antibiotic with both antibacterial and antiendotoxic effects. Intraperitoneal lavage with taurolidine solution may reduce the risks associated with performing primary colonic anastomosis in patients with secondary peritonitis.

Indexed as

Anastomosis, SurgicalAnimalsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalColonDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHydroxyprolinePeritoneal LavagePeritonitisPressureRatsRats, WistarTaurineThiadiazinesAnti-Infective Agents, LocalHydroxyprolineTaurinetaurolidineThiadiazines

Identifiers

PMID16633750
OpenAlexW2076333456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.