Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16632597›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2006

Expression profiling the developing mammalian enteric nervous system identifies marker and candidate Hirschsprung disease genes.

Tiffany A Heanue, Vassilis Pachnis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Whole-Gut Spatial Genomic Analysis Reveals Molecular Regionalization of the Differentiating Zebrafish Enteric Nervous System.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The enteric nervous system in gastrointestinal disease etiology.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  18. Role of ARHGEF3 as a GEF and mTORC2 Regulator.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. MicroRNA-4516-mediated regulation ofJournal of medical genetics · 2020
    Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tiffany A HeanueDivision of Molecular Neurobiology, National Institute for Medical Research, Medical Research Council, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, United Kingdom.
Vassilis Pachnis
Medical Research Council · GB

Funding

THE DETERMINANTS OF MUTATIONP01CA023767 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI AXEL, RICHARD · 1985 to 2008
$8.3M
Medical Research Council MC_U117537087NCI NIH HHS CA23767NCI NIH HHS P01 CA023767
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The enteric nervous system (ENS) is composed of neurons and glial cells, organized as interconnected ganglia within the gut wall, which controls peristalsis of the gut wall and secretions from its glands. The Ret receptor tyrosine kinase is expressed throughout enteric neurogenesis and is required for normal ENS development; humans with mutations in the RET locus have Hirschsprung disease (HSCR, an absence of ganglia in the colon), and mice lacking Ret have total intestinal aganglionosis. The Ret mutant mouse provides a tool for identifying genes implicated in development of the ENS. By using RNA from WT and Ret mutant (aganglionic) gut tissue and DNA microarrays, we have conducted a differential screen for ENS-expressed genes and have identified hundreds of candidate ENS-expressed genes. Forty-seven genes were selected for further analysis, representing diverse functional classes. We show that all of the analyzed genes are expressed in the ENS and that the screen was sensitive enough to identify genes marking only subpopulations of ENS cells. Our screen, therefore, was reliable and sensitive and has identified many previously undescribed genes for studying ENS development. Moreover, two of the genes identified in our screen Arhgef3 and Ctnnal1, have human homologues that map to previously identified HSCR susceptibility loci, thus representing excellent candidates for HSCR genes. This comprehensive profile of ENS gene expression refines our understanding of ENS development and serves as a resource for future developmental, biochemical, and human genetic studies.

Indexed as

Genetic Markersalpha CateninAnimalsBiomarkersChromosomes, Human, XEnteric Nervous SystemGastrointestinal TractGene Expression ProfilingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGuanine Nucleotide Exchange FactorsHirschsprung DiseaseHumansMiceMice, KnockoutMutationOligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysisalpha CateninARHGEF3 protein, humanBiomarkersCTNNAL1 protein, humanGenetic MarkersGuanine Nucleotide Exchange FactorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retRET protein, humanRho Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors

Identifiers

PMID16632597
PMCPMC1458994
OpenAlexW1986631342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.