Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16630358›Full record

Trial reportArthritis research & therapy2006

Initial clinical trial of epratuzumab (humanized anti-CD22 antibody) for immunotherapy of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Thomas Dörner, Joerg Kaufmann, William A Wegener, Nick Teoh, David M Goldenberg, Gerd R Burmester

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Arthritis research & therapy, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 95 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
22.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 306 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. B Cell Tolerance and Targeted Therapies in SLE.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. B Cell Aberrance in Lupus: the Ringleader and the Solution.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2022
    Review
  18. Modulation of immune cell reactivity withProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas DörnerDepartment of Medicine/Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charite Hospital, Berlin, Germany. thomas.doerner@charite.de
Joerg Kaufmann
William A Wegener
Nick Teoh
David M Goldenberg
Gerd R Burmester
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEImmunomedics (United States) · USCenter for Molecular Medicine and Immunology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

B cells play an important role in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), so the safety and activity of anti-B cell immunotherapy with the humanized anti-CD22 antibody epratuzumab was evaluated in SLE patients. An open-label, single-center study of 14 patients with moderately active SLE (total British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) score 6 to 12) was conducted. Patients received 360 mg/m2 epratuzumab intravenously every 2 weeks for 4 doses with analgesic/antihistamine premedication (but no steroids) prior to each dose. Evaluations at 6, 10, 18 and 32 weeks (6 months post-treatment) follow-up included safety, SLE activity (BILAG score), blood levels of epratuzumab, B and T cells, immunoglobulins, and human anti-epratuzumab antibody (HAHA) titers. Total BILAG scores decreased by > or = 50% in all 14 patients at some point during the study (including 77% with a > or = 50% decrease at 6 weeks), with 92% having decreases of various amounts continuing to at least 18 weeks (where 38% showed a >/= 50% decrease). Almost all patients (93%) experienced improvements in at least one BILAG B- or C-level disease activity at 6, 10 and 18 weeks. Additionally, 3 patients with multiple BILAG B involvement at baseline had completely resolved all B-level disease activities by 18 weeks. Epratuzumab was well tolerated, with a median infusion time of 32 minutes. Drug serum levels were measurable for at least 4 weeks post-treatment and detectable in most samples at 18 weeks. B cell levels decreased by an average of 35% at 18 weeks and remained depressed at 6 months post-treatment. Changes in routine safety laboratory tests were infrequent and without any consistent pattern, and there was no evidence of immunogenicity or significant changes in T cells, immunoglobulins, or autoantibody levels. In patients with mild to moderate active lupus, 360 mg/m2 epratuzumab was well tolerated, with evidence of clinical improvement after the first infusion and durable clinical benefit across most body systems. As such, multicenter controlled studies are being conducted in broader patient populations.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, AntinuclearAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDNAHumansImmunotherapyLupus Erythematosus, SystemicMiddle AgedSafetySialic Acid Binding Ig-like Lectin 2Antibodies, AntinuclearAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDNAepratuzumabSialic Acid Binding Ig-like Lectin 2

Identifiers

PMID16630358
PMCPMC1526638
OpenAlexW2140433336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.