Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16627917›Full record

ReviewEndocrine pathology2005

The role of immunohistochemical markers in the diagnosis of follicular-patterned lesions of the thyroid.

Sylvia L Asa

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Endocrine pathology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sylvia L AsaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. sylvia.asa@uhn.on.ca
Toronto General Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thyroid nodules are extremely common in the general population. The differential diagnosis includes numerous entities, non-neoplastic and neoplastic, benign and malignant. However, the diagnosis of follicular-patterned lesions remains an area fraught with controversy and diagnostic criteria are highly variable. It is, therefore, a field in need of objective, scientific markers that better characterize these lesions than has been possible by classical morphology. A number of candidates have been proposed. No single marker can identify all malignant follicular-patterned lesions, however, various combinations have been proposed. They include HBME-1, high molecular weight cytokeratins and ret, galectin-3 and TPO, galectin-3, fibronectin-1, CITED-1, HBME-1, and CK19. Advances in our understanding of the molecular basis of thyroid cancer will allow the identification of new markers and more accurate characterization of specific subtypes of neoplasia and malignancy. As new markers are characterized and validated, directed by molecular profiling of thyroid lesions with characteristic morphology, behavior, and outcome, they will become available as routine immunohistochemical markers that will provide a more accurate, scientific, and clinically relevant consultation report from the pathologist for cytology and surgical pathology procedures. Application of these markers will enhance the diagnosis of thyroid nodules and better guide the management of patients with these lesions.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Papillary, FollicularDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansImmunohistochemistryThyroid NeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID16627917
OpenAlexW2020314607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.