Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16627230›Full record

ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2006

Management of common bile duct stones.

Eric S Hungness, Nathaniel J Soper

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02460523 (Management and Outcome of Borderline Common Bile Duct With Stone), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02460523 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2012, after this paper: background citation

Management and Outcome of Borderline Common Bile Duct With Stone

TypeinterventionalSponsorMansoura UniversityRan2012 to 2015Enrolled35ConditionsCommon Bile Duct StoneArmsconservative, ERCP
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Surgical Treatment for Choledocholithiasis Following Repeated Failed Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Choledocholithiasis-a new clinical pathway.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eric S HungnessDepartment of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA.
Nathaniel J Soper

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeCholedocholithiasisCommon Bile DuctGallstonesHumansLaparoscopySphincterotomy, Endoscopic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.