ReviewProgress in cardiovascular diseases
From JNC I to JNC 7--what have we learned?
Review in Progress in cardiovascular diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Antihypertensive therapy and the J-curve: fact or fiction?Current hypertension reports · 2015Review
- Treatment of hypertension in older persons: what is the evidence?Drugs & aging · 2014Review
- The treatment of hypertension: a remarkable success story.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2013Article
- Molecular mechanisms of experimental salt-sensitive hypertension.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2012Article
- All thiazide-like diuretics are not chlorthalidone: putting the ACCOMPLISH study into perspective.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2009Article
- Seven decades of progress.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2007Article
- Blood pressure goals for hypertension guidelines: what is wrong with "optimal"?Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2006Article
- Optimizing hypertension control in patients with multiple cardiovascular risk factors.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2006Article
- Historical perspectives on the management of hypertension.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2006Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16627046What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.