Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16626523›Full record

GuidelineJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC2006

Canadian Consensus Conference on osteoporosis, 2006 update.

Jacques P Brown, Michel Fortier, Heather Frame, André Lalonde, Alexandra Papaioannou, Vyta Senikas, Chui Kin Yuen, Osteoporosis Guidelines Committee

Abstract readConsensus StatementPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Impact of a centralized osteoporosis coordinator on post-fracture osteoporosis management: a cluster randomized trial.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2012
    Trial
  3. Denosumab-related osteonecrosis of the jaw after tooth extraction and the effects of a short drug holiday in cancer patients: a multicenter retrospective study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evaluation of Bone Mineral Density in Perimenopausal Period.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. An economic evaluation: Simulation of the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of universal prevention strategies against osteoporosis-related fractures.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2013
    Article
  13. Denosumab: mechanism of action and clinical outcomes.International journal of clinical practice · 2012
    Review
  14. Osteoporosis medication prescribing in British Columbia and Ontario: impact of public drug coverage.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2012
    Article
  15. How applicable are clinical practice guidelines to elderly patients with comorbidities?Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2011
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jacques P BrownQuebec QC.
Michel Fortier
Heather Frame
André Lalonde
Alexandra Papaioannou
Vyta Senikas
Chui Kin Yuen
Osteoporosis Guidelines Committee

Funding

CIHR 73426-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo provide guidelines for the health care provider on the diagnosis and clinical management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. OUTCOMES: Strategies for identifying and evaluating high-risk individuals, the use of bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers in assessing diagnosis and response to management, and recommendations regarding nutrition, physical activity, and the selection of pharmacologic therapy to prevent and manage osteoporosis. EVIDENCE: MEDLINE and the Cochrane database were searched for articles in English on subjects related to osteoporosis diagnosis, prevention, and management from March 2001 to April 2005. The authors critically reviewed the evidence and developed the recommendations according to the Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada's methodology and consensus development process. VALUES: The quality of evidence is rated using the criteria described in the report of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. Recommendations for practice are ranked according to the method described in this report. SPONSORS: The development of this consensus guideline was supported by unrestricted educational grants from Berlex Canada Inc., Lilly Canada, Merck Frosst, Novartis, Novogen, Novo Nordisk, Proctor and Gamble, Schering Canada, and Wyeth Canada.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansOsteoporosisOsteoporotic Fractures

Identifiers

PMID16626523
PMCPMC5110318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.