SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2006
Intravenous in-line filters for preventing morbidity and mortality in neonates.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antimicrobial dressings for the prevention of catheter-related infections in newborn infants with central venous catheters.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Intravenous in-line filters for preventing morbidity and mortality in neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- In-line filtration in very preterm neonates: a randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2020Trial
- In-line filtration reduces severe complications and length of stay on pediatric intensive care unit: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.Intensive care medicine · 2012Trial
- [Development of an infusion regimen to avoid incompatibilities in adult intensive care patients].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026Review
- Strategies for Assessing Physical Compatibility of Calcium Folinate with Bicarbonate During Methotrexate Rescue Therapy in Pediatric Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Strategies for Reducing Vancomycin-Piperacillin/Tazobactam Incompatibility.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Strategies to prevent drug incompatibility during simultaneous multi-drug infusion in intensive care units: a literature review.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2021Review
- Optimising an Infusion Protocol Containing Cefepime to Limit Particulate Load to Newborns in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
- Effectiveness of in-Line Filters to Completely Remove Particulate Contamination During a Pediatric Multidrug Infusion Protocol.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- IV injection of polystyrene beads for mouse model of sepsis causes severe glomerular injury.Journal of intensive care · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVenous access is an essential part of caring for the sick neonate; however, problems such as contamination of fluids with bacteria, endotoxins and particulates have been associated with intravenous infusion therapy. Intravenous in-line filters claim to be an effective strategy for the removal of bacteria, endotoxins and particulates associated with intravenous therapy in adults and are increasingly being recommended for use in neonates.
objectivesTo assess whether in-line filters on intravenous lines prevent morbidity and mortality in neonates. SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were made of the electronic databases MEDLINE (from 1966 to September 2005), EMBASE (from 1980 to September 2005), CINAHL (from 1982 to September 2005) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 3 2005 ). There was no language restriction. Further searching included cross references, abstracts, conferences, symposia proceedings, expert informants and journal handsearching. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials that compared the use of intravenous in-line filters with placebo or nothing in neonates were included in the review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The procedures of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group (CNRG) were followed throughout. Titles and abstracts identified from the search were checked by the review authors. The full text of all studies of possible relevance were obtained. The review authors independently assessed the trials for their methodological quality and subsequent inclusion in the review. Statistical analysis followed the procedures of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. Dichotomous data is expressed as relative risk and 95% confidence intervals, and risk difference and 95% confidence intervals. MAIN
resultsThere were three eligible studies, which recruited a total of 262 neonates. For most of the outcomes for this review, only one study of 88 neonates contributed eligible data. This review found no significant effect of in-line filters in any of the reported outcomes of overall mortality, proven and unproven septicaemia, phlebitis, necrotizing enterocolitis, duration of cannula patency, number of catheters inserted and financial costs. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThere are insufficient data to determine whether or not the use of intravenous in-line filters prevent morbidity and mortality in neonates. The wide confidence intervals on outcomes indicate the imprecise estimates of treatment effect due to the small numbers of patients and events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.