Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16625591›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2006

Insecticide-treated nets for preventing malaria in pregnancy.

C Gamble, J P Ekwaru, F O ter Kuile

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 124 papers, 20 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
124citing papers in PubMed, 20 pooled it
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

124 citing papers in PubMed, 20 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 236 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Mefloquine for preventing malaria in pregnant women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  6. Insecticide-treated nets for preventing malaria.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Mefloquine for preventing malaria in pregnant women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Malaria: prevention in travellers.BMJ clinical evidence · 2010
    Pooled it
  16. Indoor residual spraying for preventing malaria.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Drugs for treating uncomplicated malaria in pregnant women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008
    Pooled it
  19. Malaria: prevention in travellers.BMJ clinical evidence · 2007
    Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

64 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

C GambleUniversity of Liverpool, Centre for Medical Statistics and Health Evaluation, Shelley's Cottage, Brownlow Street, Liverpool, UK, L69 3GS. c.gamble@liv.ac.uk
J P Ekwaru
F O ter Kuile
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · UGLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalaria in pregnancy is associated with adverse consequences for mother and fetus. Protection with insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) during pregnancy is widely advocated, but evidence of their benefit has been inconsistent.

objectivesTo compare the impact of ITNs with no nets or untreated nets on preventing malaria in pregnancy. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register (January 2006), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2005, Issue 4), MEDLINE (1966 to January 2006), EMBASE (1974 to January 2006), LILACS (1982 to January 2006), and reference lists. We also contacted researchers working in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Individual and cluster randomized controlled trials of ITNs in pregnant women. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three authors independently assessed trials for methodological quality and extracted data. Data were combined using the generic inverse variance method. MAIN

resultsSix randomized controlled trials were identified, five of which met the inclusion criteria: four trials from sub-Saharan Africa compared ITNs with no nets, and one trial from Asia compared ITNs with untreated nets. Two trials randomized individual women and three trials randomized communities. In Africa, ITNs, compared with no nets, reduced placental malaria in all pregnancies (relative risk (RR) 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63 to 0.98). They also reduced low birthweight (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.98) and stillbirths/abortions in the first to fourth pregnancy (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.97), but not in women with more than four previous pregnancies. For anaemia and clinical malaria, results tended to favour ITNs, but the effects were not significant. In Thailand, one trial randomizing individuals to ITNs or untreated nets showed a significant reduction in anaemia and stillbirths/abortions in all pregnancies but not for clinical malaria or low birthweight. AUTHORS'

conclusionsITNs have a beneficial impact on pregnancy outcome in malaria-endemic regions of Africa when used by communities or by individual women. No further trials of ITNs in pregnancy are required in sub-Saharan Africa. Further evaluation of the potential impact of ITNs is required in areas with less intense and Plasmodium vivax transmission in Asia and Latin America.

Indexed as

Bedding and LinensInsecticidesAnemiaAnimalsAntimalarialsFemaleHumansMalariaMosquito ControlNitrilesPermethrinPregnancyPregnancy Complications, HematologicPregnancy Complications, ParasiticPyrethrinsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntimalarialscyfluthrinInsecticidesNitrilesPermethrinPyrethrins

Identifiers

PMID16625591
PMCPMC6532581
OpenAlexW2142389365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.