SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2006
Anti-IgE for chronic asthma in adults and children.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 236 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term efficacy and safety of omalizumab in patients with persistent uncontrolled allergic asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2015Pooled it
- Comparative effectiveness of long term drug treatment strategies to prevent asthma exacerbations: network meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2014Pooled it
- Omalizumab for asthma in adults and children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Chloroquine as a steroid sparing agent for asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2003Pooled it
- Omalizumab and long-term quality of life outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma: a systematic review.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseasePooled it
- Efficacy of omalizumab in adult patients with allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: a multicentre study in China.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2024Article
- A robust mRNA signature obtained via recursive ensemble feature selection predicts the responsiveness of omalizumab in moderate-to-severe asthma.Clinical and translational allergy · 2023Article
- Epidemiology and Immunopathogenesis of Virus Associated Asthma Exacerbations.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2023Review
- The Role ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Real-life omalizumab exposure and discontinuation in a large nationwide population-based study of paediatric and adult asthma patients.The European respiratory journal · 2022Article
- Effectiveness of omalizumab in patients with severe allergic asthma with and without chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a PROXIMA study post hoc analysis.Clinical and translational allergy · 2020Article
- An Omalizumab Biobetter Antibody With Improved Stability and Efficacy for the Treatment of Allergic Diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Article
- Review
- Omalizumab and unmet needs in severe asthma and allergic comorbidities in Japanese children.Asia Pacific allergy · 2019Review
- Long Sun-Exposures Influencing High Sub-Cutaneous Synthesis of Vitamin-D3 may be Associated with Exacerbation of Symptoms in Allergic-Asthma.The journal of aging research & clinical practice · 2018Article
- Two decades with omalizumab: what we still have to learn.Biologics : targets & therapy · 2018Review
- Successful long-term, adjunctive use of guaifenesin in a patient with a complex atopic medical history and primary immune deficiency: A case report.Respiratory medicine case reports · 2018Article
- Development of New Therapies for Severe Asthma.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2017Review
- Advances in the treatment of virus-induced asthma.Expert review of respiratory medicine · 2016Review
- IgE-Related Chronic Diseases and Anti-IgE-Based Treatments.Journal of immunology research · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOmalizumab is a recombinant humanised monoclonal antibody directed against immunoglobulin E (anti-IgE) to inhibit the immune system's response to allergen exposure. Omalizumab is directed against the binding site of IgE for its high affinity Fc receptor. It prevents free serum IgE from attaching to mast cells and other effector cells and prevents IgE mediated inflammatory changes.
objectivesTo determine the efficacy of anti-IgE compared with placebo in patients with allergic asthma SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Asthma trials register for potentially relevant studies (February 2006). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials examining anti-IgE administered in any manner for any duration. Trials with co-interventions were included as long as they were the same in each arm. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed study quality and extracted and entered data. Three modes of administration were identified from the published literature (inhaled, intravenous and subcutaneous injection). Subgroup analysis was performed by asthma severity. Data were extracted from published and unpublished sources. MAIN
resultsFourteen trials (15 group comparisons) were included in the review, contributing a total of 3143 mild to severe allergic asthmatic participants with high levels of IgE. Treatment with intravenous and subcutaneous Omalizumab significantly reduced free IgE compared with placebo. Omalizumab led to a significant reduction in inhaled steroid (ICS) consumption compared with placebo (-119 mcg/day (95% CI -154 to -83, three trials)). There were significant increases in the number of participants who were able to reduce ICS by over 50% (odds ratio (OR) 2.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.02 to 3.10 (four trials)); or completely withdraw their daily ICS intake (OR 2.50 (95%CI 2.00 to 3.13; four trials)). Participants treated with Omalizumab were less likely to suffer an asthma exacerbation with treatment as an adjunct to ICS (OR 0.52, 95%CI 0.41 to 0.65, five trials), or as an ICS tapering agent (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.60, four trials). AUTHORS'
conclusionsOmalizumab was significantly more effective than placebo at increasing the numbers of patients who were able to reduce or withdraw their inhaled steroids, but the clinical value of the reduction in steroid consumption has be considered in the light of the high cost of Omalizumab. The impressive placebo effects observed in control groups bring into question the true effect of Omalizumab. Omalizumab was effective in reducing asthma exacerbations as an adjunctive therapy to inhaled steroids, and during steroid tapering phases of clinical trials. Omalizumab was generally well tolerated, although there were more injection site reactions with Omalizumab. Patient and physician assessments of the drug were positive. Further assessment in paediatric populations is necessary, as is direct double-dummy comparison with ICS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.