SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2006
Expectant care versus surgical treatment for miscarriage.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- The estimated annual cost of uterine leiomyomata in the United States.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2012Pooled it
- Medical treatments for incomplete miscarriage (less than 24 weeks).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Medical treatment for early fetal death (less than 24 weeks).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2006Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of myrrh in patients with incomplete abortion: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2020Trial
- Women's Preferences in Early Pregnancy Loss Management: A Focus on Psychological Considerations Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process.The patient · 2026Article
- Management of miscarriage: a matter of choice? A mixed- methods research study in Northern Ireland.Reproductive health · 2026Article
- Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Women Conceived Less Than 6 Months after First Trimester Dilation and Curettage.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- A Comparative Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Vaginal vs Oral Prostaglandin E1 Analogue (Misoprostol) in Management of First Trimester Missed Abortion.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2016Article
- Expectant Versus Surgical Management of Early Pregnancy Miscarriages- A Prospective Study.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2015Article
- Expectant management of miscarriage in view of NICE Guideline 154.Journal of pregnancy · 2014Observational
- Misoprostol Abortion: Ultrasonography versus Beta-hCG Testing for Verification of Effectiveness.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2013Article
- The family medicine residency training initiative in miscarriage management: impact on practice in Washington State.Family medicine · 2013Article
- Evidence for perinatal and child health care guidelines in crisis settings: can Cochrane help?BMC public health · 2010Article
- Treatment patterns for early pregnancy failure in Michigan.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2009Article
- Does dilation and curettage affect future pregnancy outcomes?Ochsner journal · 2007Article
- Spontaneous miscarriage in the first trimester.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2006Article
- Effect of misoprostol with and without evening primrose (Avicenna journal of phytomedicineArticle
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMiscarriage is a common complication of early pregnancy that can have both medical and psychological consequences like depression and anxiety. The need for routine surgical evacuation with miscarriage has been questioned because of potential complications such as cervical trauma, uterine perforation, hemorrhage, or infection.
objectivesTo compare the safety and effectiveness of expectant management versus surgical treatment for early pregnancy loss. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Trials Register (December 2005), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2004, Issue 3), PubMed (1966 to March 2005), POPLINE (inception to March 2005), and LILACS (1982 to March 2005) and reference lists of reviews. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized trials comparing expectant care and surgical treatment (vacuum aspiration or dilation and curettage (D & C)) for miscarriage were eligible for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information. MAIN
resultsFive trials were included in this review with 689 total participants. The expectant-care group was more likely to have an incomplete miscarriage (RR 5.37; 95% CI 2.57 to 11.22). However, the time frames for declaring the process incomplete varied across the studies. The need for unplanned surgical treatment (such as vacuum aspiration or D&C) was greater for the expectant-care group (RR 4.78; 95% CI 1.99 to 11.48). The expectant-care group had more days of bleeding (WMD 1.59; 95% CI 0.74 to 2.45) and a greater amount of bleeding (WMD 1.00; 95% CI 0.60 to 1.40). Post-procedure diagnosis of infection was lower in the expectant-care group (RR 0.29; 95% CI 0.09 to 0.87). Information on psychological outcomes and pregnancy was too limited to draw conclusions. AUTHORS'
conclusionsExpectant management led to a higher risk of incomplete miscarriage, need for surgical emptying of the uterus, and bleeding. None of these were serious. In contrast, surgical evacuation was associated with a significantly higher risk of infection. Given the lack of clear superiority of either approach, the woman's preference should play a dominant role in decision making. Medical management has added choices for women and their clinicians, but these were not reviewed here.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.