Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16625540›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2006

Antibiotics versus placebo for acute bacterial conjunctivitis.

A Sheikh, B Hurwitz

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Antibiotics versus placebo for acute bacterial conjunctivitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Acute infective conjunctivitis in primary care: who needs antibiotics? An individual patient data meta-analysis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Common eye infections.Australian prescriber · 2018
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Conjunctivitis: systematic approach to diagnosis and therapy.Current infectious disease reports · 2011
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Bacterial conjunctivitis.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2010
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A SheikhUniversity of Edinburgh, Division of Community Health Sciences: GP Section, 20 West Richmond Street, Edinburgh, UK, EH8 9DX. Aziz.Sheikh@ed.ac.uk
B Hurwitz
King's College London · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are concerns about whether antibiotic therapy confers significant clinical benefit in the treatment of acute bacterial conjunctivitis.

objectivesThe aim of this review was to assess the benefit and harm of antibiotic therapy in the management of acute bacterial conjunctivitis. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register), MEDLINE, EMBASE, SIGLE, NRR, PubMed and the reference lists of identified trial reports. We used the Science Citation Index to look for articles that cited the relevant studies, and we contacted investigators and pharmaceutical companies for information about additional trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included double masked randomised controlled trials in which any form of antibiotic treatment had been compared with placebo in the management of acute bacterial conjunctivitis. This included topical, systemic and combination (for example, antibiotics and steroids) antibiotic treatments. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One author extracted data and the accuracy was checked by a second author. MAIN

resultsThis review includes five trials which randomised a total of 1034 participants. One further trial is currently 'awaiting assessment'. This has been published in abstract form and has yet to be fully reported. Three of the trials have been conducted on a selected specialist care patient population and the two more recent trials have been conducted in a community care setting. The trials were heterogeneous in terms of their inclusion and exclusion criteria, the nature of the intervention, and the outcome measures assessed. Meta-analyses of data on clinical and microbiological remission rates reveal that topical antibiotics are of benefit in improving early (days 2 to 5) clinical (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.45) and microbiological (RR 1.77, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.54) remission rates; later (days 6 to 10) data reveal that these early advantages in clinical (RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.21) and microbiological cure rates are reduced (RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.09), but persist. Most cases however resolve spontaneously with clinical remission being achieved in 65% (95% CI 59 to 70) by days 2 to 5 in those receiving placebo. No serious outcomes were reported in either the active or placebo arms of these trials, indicating that important sight-threatening complications are an infrequent occurrence. AUTHORS'

conclusionsAcute bacterial conjunctivitis is frequently a self-limiting condition, but the use of antibiotics is associated with significantly improved rates of clinical and microbiological remission.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAnti-Bacterial AgentsConjunctivitis, BacterialHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID16625540
OpenAlexW4235453801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.