Trial reportJournal of human hypertension2006

Effect of pravastatin on blood pressure in people with cardiovascular disease.

M Tonelli, F Sacks, M Pfeffer, F Lopez-Jimenez, G S Jhangri, G Curhan

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of human hypertension, 2006. The graph read 2 numbers from its abstract, feeding 1 cell of the map: it finds no clear difference in 1. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

2numbers the graph read from it
1cell of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
1 · no effect
Blood pressureno clear difference · against placebo · hypertension, ascvdfeeds one cell of the map
OR 0.970.73 to 1.27
Pravastatin did not reduce the adjusted risk of incident systolic hypertension (odds ratio 0.99, 95% CI 0.80-1.23), or incident diastolic hypertension (odds ratio 0.97, 95% CI 0.73-1.27).
Blood pressureno clear difference · against placebo · hypertension, ascvdfeeds one cell of the map
OR 0.990.80 to 1.23
Pravastatin did not reduce the adjusted risk of incident systolic hypertension (odds ratio 0.99, 95% CI 0.80-1.23), or incident diastolic hypertension (odds ratio 0.97, 95% CI 0.73-1.27).

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

Statins×blood pressure

InconclusiveOpen on the map →What to test next →

8 readable studies in this cell: 3 favour the treatment, 4 find no difference, 1 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.80replicated · 4 families support, 1 contradict · against placebo
Without it
0.80This paper does not move the number.
← favours the comparatorfavours the treatment →
1 · no effect
This paper · 2006
OR 0.970.73 to 1.27
NCT03944512102 enrolled · 2019
RR 3.000.32 to 77.2
4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Antihypertensive effects of statins: a meta-analysis of prospective controlled studies.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2013 · on this map
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Statins and blood pressure: is there an effect or not?Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2007
    Review
6 · The record

Corrections and comments

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

M TonelliDivision of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. mtonelli@ualberta.ca
F Sacks
M Pfeffer
F Lopez-Jimenez
G S Jhangri
G Curhan
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USProvincial Laboratory of Public Health · CAUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

Experimental evidence and several small studies in humans suggest that HMG-CoA (3-hydroxy 3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A) reductase inhibitors (statins) reduce blood pressure, perhaps through effects on endothelial function or by reducing inflammation. We tested the hypothesis that pravastatin would reduce blood pressure at 3 months and the risk of developing new hypertension over a follow-up period of 5 years. This was a post hoc subgroup analysis of a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of pravastatin 40 mg daily vs placebo in 4159 participants with previous myocardial infarction and total plasma cholesterol <240 mg/dl (6.2 mmol/l). The primary outcome was the unadjusted change in mean arterial pressure (MAP) from baseline to 3 months. We also considered systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) and pulse pressure. Analysis of covariance was used to calculate the adjusted effect of treatment on change in these outcomes at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postrandomization, after controlling for potential confounders. Logistic regression was used to calculate the adjusted effect of treatment on incident hypertension (blood pressure > or =140/90 in those without known hypertension at baseline). This analysis included 4126/4159 (99.2%) participants for whom blood pressure was measured at baseline and during at least one follow-up visit. Median duration of follow-up was 57.8 months. The unadjusted and adjusted change in MAP, SBP, DBP or pulse pressure from baseline was not significantly different for pravastatin or placebo recipients at 3, 6, 12 or 24 months after randomization, or at last follow-up. Pravastatin did not reduce the adjusted risk of incident systolic hypertension (odds ratio 0.99, 95% CI 0.80-1.23), or incident diastolic hypertension (odds ratio 0.97, 95% CI 0.73-1.27). In summary, pravastatin 40 mg daily did not reduce blood pressure in survivors of myocardial infarction without overt hypercholesterolaemia.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureCardiovascular DiseasesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPravastatinRisk FactorsAntihypertensive AgentsPravastatin

Identifiers

PMID16625234
OpenAlexW2070340117

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.