SynthesisJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2006
Continuous positive airway pressure: early, late, or stay with synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation?
Synthesis in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00821119 (A Randomized Controlled Trial of Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation Versus Nasal Continuous Positive Pressure as a Primary Mode for Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation Versus Nasal Continuous Positive Pressure as a Primary Mode for Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- A randomized controlled trial of synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in RDS.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2007Trial
- Clinical practice : noninvasive respiratory support in newborns.European journal of pediatrics · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mechanical ventilation is associated with significant short- and long-term morbidity in small preterm infants. Continuous positive airway pressure applied through nasal prongs is an effective, less-invasive method to improve gas exchange and reduce apnea in these infants. A large number of studies have evaluated the possibility of reducing the need or duration of mechanical ventilation by early use of nasal continuous positive airway pressure shortly after birth and by applying it after extubation. Although results of these trials have not been consistent, most of the evidence suggests that nasal continuous positive airway pressure is a viable alternative to mechanical ventilation in many preterm infants and that its use after extubation contributes to maintain better lung function and reduces apnea. Despite this, there is no evidence that these beneficial short-term effects translate into lower rates of long-term morbidity such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia and neurologic sequelae or mortality rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.