ArticleThe Biochemical journal2006
In-frame deletion in the EGF receptor alters kinase inhibition by gefitinib.
Article in The Biochemical journal, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Ras destabilizer KYA1797K overcomes the resistance of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor in KRAS-mutated non-small cell lung cancer.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Theoretical method for evaluation of therapeutic effects and adverse effects of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in clinical treatment.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2017Article
- Temporal resolution of autophosphorylation for normal and oncogenic forms of EGFR and differential effects of gefitinib.Biochemistry · 2012Article
- Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in combination with expression of MIG6 alters gefitinib sensitivity.BMC systems biology · 2011Article
- Epidermal growth factor receptor lacking C-terminal autophosphorylation sites retains signal transduction and high sensitivity to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor.Cancer science · 2009Article
- N-Glycan fucosylation of epidermal growth factor receptor modulates receptor activity and sensitivity to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor.Cancer science · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The existence of an in-frame deletion mutant correlates with the sensitivity of lung cancers to EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor)-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We reported previously that the in-frame 15-bp deletional mutation (delE746-A750 type deletion) was constitutively active in cells. Kinetic parameters are important for characterizing an enzyme; however, it remains unclear whether the kinetic parameters of deletion mutant EGFR are similar to those of wild-type EGFR. We analysed autophosphorylation in response to ATP and inhibition of gefitinib for deletion mutant EGFR and wild-type EGFR. Kinetic studies, examining autophosphorylation, were carried out using EGFR fractions extracted from 293-pDelta15 and 293-pEGFR cells transfected with deletion mutant EGFR and wild-type EGFR respectively. We demonstrated the difference in activities between unstimulated wild-type (K(m) for ATP=4.0+/-0.3 microM) and mutant EGFR (K(m) for ATP=2.5+/-0.2 microM). There was no difference in K(m) values between EGF-stimulated wild-type EGFR (K(m) for ATP=1.9+/-0.1 microM) and deletion mutant EGFR (K(m) for ATP=2.2+/-0.2 microM). These results suggest that mutant EGFR is active without ligand stimulation. The K(i) value for gefitinib of the deletion mutant EGFR was much lower than that of wild-type EGFR. These results suggest that the deletion mutant EGFR has a higher affinity for gefitinib than wild-type EGFR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.