Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16622651›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2006

G-CSF mobilised granulocyte transfusions in 32 paediatric patients with neutropenic sepsis.

Lorenz Grigull, Nicole Pulver, Lilia Goudeva, Karl-Walter Sykora, Christin Linderkamp, Andreas Beilken, Kathrin Seidemann, Hansjörg Schmid, Karl Welte, Hans-Gert Heuft

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Does granulocyte transfusion play a role in the multidisciplinary treatment of invasive mycosis?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lorenz GrigullDepartment of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, OE 6780 Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany. Grigull.Lorenz@mh-hannover.de
Nicole Pulver
Lilia Goudeva
Karl-Walter Sykora
Christin Linderkamp
Andreas Beilken
Kathrin Seidemann
Hansjörg Schmid
Karl Welte
Hans-Gert Heuft
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn this retrospective, uncontrolled, observational study, the effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-stimulated granulocyte transfusions (GTX) in neutropenic paediatric patients with sepsis was evaluated. PATIENTS AND

methodsGranulocytes were collected from unrelated, ABO group-matched and cytomegalic-antibody compatible donors. For neutrophil mobilization, donors received a single subcutaneous dose of glycosylated G-CSF (Lenograstim, Chugai Pharma, Japan) plus oral dexamethasone (8 mg). In total, 168 (range 1-19 per patient) GTX were transfused in 32 children with a median age of 7.4 (0.25 to 16) years.

resultsThe underlying diseases comprised predominantly haematooncological malignancies (31 children). In 15 of 32 patients, neutropenia was related to allogeneic stem cell transplantation. All children suffered from sepsis based on international criteria (fever, tachycardia, respiratory rate >2 SD above normal in the context of a suspected or proven infection). In ten children bacteria were isolated, in six children a fungal infection was diagnosed and four sepsis episodes were caused by viral infections. GTX contained a median neutrophil number of 6.3 (range 1.9-13.9)x10(10) per transfusion and obtained a sustained haematological response after GTX. Nineteen out of 32 children survived the neutropenic sepsis, particularly nine out of 11 patients with bacterial sepsis. DISCUSSION: In contrast to the non-survivors, we observed a significant decrease in the C-reactive protein levels shortly after initiation of the GTX treatment in the surviving patients. A clear-cut benefit of GTX for children with neutropenic sepsis cannot be concluded from these data, but in children with (severe) bacterial sepsis refractory to antibiotic treatment, GTX were feasible, safe and could reduce mortality rates in this subgroup of patients.

Indexed as

Leukocyte TransfusionAcute DiseaseAdolescentAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkersBlood Component RemovalChildChild, PreschoolC-Reactive ProteinFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGermanyGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorGranulocytesAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID16622651
PMCPMC7102011
OpenAlexW2057898443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.