Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16622466›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2006

Oestrogen receptor beta and neoadjuvant therapy with tamoxifen: prediction of response and effects of treatment.

W R Miller, T J Anderson, J M Dixon, P T K Saunders

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Differential expression of estrogen receptor α, β1, and β2 in lobular and ductal breast cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Sex hormone receptor repertoire in breast cancer.International journal of breast cancer · 2013
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

W R MillerBreast Unit Research Group, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK.
T J Anderson
J M Dixon
P T K Saunders
Western General Hospital · GBMRC Centre for Reproductive Health · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U127685844Medical Research Council U.1276.00.002.00005.01 (85844)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to elucidate the relative importance of oestrogen receptor (ER)alpha, ERbeta and an ERbeta variant (ERbeta2/betacx) in the response of breast cancers to tamoxifen, tumour levels of each receptor were assessed in 36 patients before and after 3 months of neoadjuvant treatment with tamoxifen (20 mg daily). All patients were postmenopausal women presenting with large ERalpha-positive breast cancers. Clinical response to treatment was assessed by tumour volume changes as determined from sequential ultrasounds and pathological response by comparison of the tumour morphology before and after treatment. Of 33 cases, 23 (70%) were classified as having a clinical response and 16 (48%) as having a response pathologically. All tumours stained positively for ERalpha and ERbeta and 15 out of 33 (45%) for ERbeta2/betacx. There were no significant differences in quantitative expression of any receptor between tumours that subsequently responded and that did not, whether response was assessed clinically or pathologically. Tamoxifen treatment was associated with a decrease in ERalpha, but an increase was the most frequent change (17 out of 33) in ERbeta, and no consistent change was evident in staining of the ERbeta2/betacx variant. In summary, ERbeta1 and ERbeta2/betacx variant protein are detected in ERalpha-positive breast tumours but their expression is not associated with a response to tamoxifen. Differential changes in ERalpha and ERbeta were seen with treatment.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAlternative SplicingAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsEstrogen Receptor alphaEstrogen Receptor betaFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisProtein IsoformsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalEstrogen Receptor alphaEstrogen Receptor betaProtein IsoformsTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID16622466
PMCPMC2361404
OpenAlexW2111993522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.