SynthesisBritish journal of cancer2006
Systematic review of factors influencing patient and practitioner delay in diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal cancer.
Synthesis in British journal of cancer, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
81 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Economic Burden of Pancreatic Cancer in Europe: a Literature Review.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- The Effectiveness of Interventional Cancer Education Programs for School Students Aged 8-19 Years: a Systematic Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021Pooled it
- Quantifying intervals to diagnosis in myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2018Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Influences on pre-hospital delay in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a systematic review.British journal of cancer · 2008Pooled it
- Improving Breast Cancer Outcomes by Enhanced Activities in Early Detection and Diagnosis: An Umbrella Review and Meta-Analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials in High-Income Contexts With Universal Healthcare Coverage.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterPooled it
- Promoting prompt help-seeking for symptoms - assessing the impact of a gynaecological cancer leaflet on presentations to primary care: a record-based randomised control trial.BMC public health · 2018Trial
- Risk factors affecting the age at onset in adult patients with multiple sclerosis.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Urine 5-HIAA and quality of life in neuroendocrine neoplasia. Is there an association?Rare tumors · 2026Article
- The impact of high-risk zip code on receiving standard of care therapy and survival in esophageal adenocarcinoma.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Esophageal cancer trends in the US from 1992 to 2019 with projections to 2044 using SEER data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Pre-existing Mental Health Disorders are Associated with Disparities in Gastric Cancer Care: An American Combined Safety Net and Teaching Hospital Experience.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Delay Patterns and Associated Factors Among Gastric Cancer Patients Visiting Tertiary Hospital in Ethiopia.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- An integrated AI-enabled system using One Class Twin Cross Learning for early gastric cancer detection.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Investigations and referral for suspected gastric cancer by primary care physicians: a cross-sectional study in Southeastern China.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Image Analysis: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Machine learning based models for predicting presentation delay risk among gastric cancer patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Systemic treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023Review
- Article
21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As knowledge on the causation of cancers advances and new treatments are developed, early recognition and accurate diagnosis becomes increasingly important. This review focused on identifying factors influencing patient and primary care practitioner delay for upper gastrointestinal cancer. A systematic methodology was applied, including extensive searches of the literature published from 1970 to 2003, systematic data extraction, quality assessment and narrative data synthesis. Included studies were those evaluating factors associated with the time interval between a patient first noticing a cancer symptom and presenting to primary care, between a patient first presenting to primary care and being referred to secondary care, or describing an intervention designed to reduce those intervals. Twenty-five studies were included in the review. Studies reporting delay intervals demonstrated that the patient phase of delay was greater than the practitioner phase, whilst patient-related research suggests that recognition of symptom seriousness is more important than recognition of the presence of the symptom. The main factors related to practitioner delay were misdiagnosis, application and interpretation of tests, and the confounding effect of existing disease. Greater understanding of patient factors is required, along with evaluation of interventions to ensure appropriate diagnosis, examination and investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.