Trial reportJAMA2006
Neurobehavioral effects of dental amalgam in children: a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in JAMA, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00066118 (The Casa Pia Study of the Health Effects of Dental Amalgam in Children.), which is not on this map. Cited by 81 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Casa Pia Study of the Health Effects of Dental Amalgam in Children.
Who cites it
81 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 242 citations in OpenAlex.
- Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent posterior teeth.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Environmental exposures and pediatric kidney function and disease: A systematic review.Environmental research · 2017Pooled it
- A systematic review of the reporting of Data Monitoring Committees' roles, interim analysis and early termination in pediatric clinical trials.BMC pediatrics · 2009Pooled it
- Dental composite materials and renal function in children.British dental journal · 2014Trial
- Dental composite restorations and neuropsychological development in children: treatment level analysis from a randomized clinical trial.Neurotoxicology · 2012Trial
- Dental composite restorations and psychosocial function in children.Pediatrics · 2012Trial
- Immune function effects of dental amalgam in children: a randomized clinical trial.Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) · 2008Trial
- Dental amalgam and psychosocial status: the New England Children's Amalgam Trial.Journal of dental research · 2008Trial
- Renal effects of dental amalgam in children: the New England children's amalgam trial.Environmental health perspectives · 2008Trial
- Dental amalgam exposure and urinary mercury levels in children: the New England Children's Amalgam Trial.Environmental health perspectives · 2008Trial
- The contribution of dental amalgam to urinary mercury excretion in children.Environmental health perspectives · 2007Trial
- Modification of neurobehavioral effects of mercury by a genetic polymorphism of coproporphyrinogen oxidase in children.Neurotoxicology and teratologyTrial
- Modification of neurobehavioral effects of mercury by genetic polymorphisms of metallothionein in children.Neurotoxicology and teratologyTrial
- Amalgam restorations for primary molars in clinical practice and dental schools: current situation and required changes.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Awareness of Amalgam and Safe Removal Techniques Among Dentists in Turkey: A Cross-Sectional Study.Oral health & preventive dentistry · 2025Article
- Oxidative genomic damage in pediatric patients exposed to mercury released by dental amalgam.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Antibacterial properties of mesoporous silica coated with cerium oxide nanoparticles in dental resin composite.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Survival Rates of Amalgam and Composite Resin Restorations from Big Data Real-Life Databases in the Era of Restricted Dental Mercury Use.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- First clinical experience with posterior lumbar interbody fusion using a thermal-sprayed silver-containing hydroxyapatite-coated cage.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
- The association of auditory function measures with low-level methylmercury from oceanic fish consumption and mercury vapor from amalgam: The Seychelles Child Development Study Nutrition 1 Cohort.Neurotoxicology · 2023Article
21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
contextDental (silver) amalgam is a widely used restorative material containing 50% elemental mercury that emits small amounts of mercury vapor. No randomized clinical trials have determined whether there are significant health risks associated with this low-level mercury exposure.
objectiveTo assess the safety of dental amalgam restorations in children.
designA randomized clinical trial in which children requiring dental restorative treatment were randomized to either amalgam for posterior restorations or resin composite instead of amalgam. Enrollment commenced February 1997, with annual follow-up for 7 years concluding in July 2005. SETTING AND
participantsA total of 507 children in Lisbon, Portugal, aged 8 to 10 years with at least 1 carious lesion on a permanent tooth, no previous exposure to amalgam, urinary mercury level <10 microg/L, blood lead level <15 microg/dL, Comprehensive Test of Nonverbal Intelligence IQ > or =67, and with no interfering health conditions.
interventionRoutine, standard-of-care dental treatment, with one group receiving amalgam restorations for posterior lesions (n = 253) and the other group receiving resin composite restorations instead of amalgam (n = 254).
main outcome measuresNeurobehavioral assessments of memory, attention/concentration, and motor/visuomotor domains, as well as nerve conduction velocities.
resultsDuring the 7-year trial period, children had a mean of 18.7 tooth surfaces (median, 16) restored in the amalgam group and 21.3 (median, 18) restored in the composite group. Baseline mean creatinine-adjusted urinary mercury levels were 1.8 microg/g in the amalgam group and 1.9 microg/g in the composite group, but during follow-up were 1.0 to 1.5 microg/g higher in the amalgam group than in the composite group (P<.001). There were no statistically significant differences in measures of memory, attention, visuomotor function, or nerve conduction velocities (average z scores were very similar, near zero) for the amalgam and composite groups over all 7 years of follow-up, with no statistically significant differences observed at any time point (P values from .29 to .91). Starting at 5 years after initial treatment, the need for additional restorative treatment was approximately 50% higher in the composite group.
conclusionsIn this study, children who received dental restorative treatment with amalgam did not, on average, have statistically significant differences in neurobehavioral assessments or in nerve conduction velocity when compared with children who received resin composite materials without amalgam. These findings, combined with the trend of higher treatment need later among those receiving composite, suggest that amalgam should remain a viable dental restorative option for children.
trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00066118.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.