ReviewDrugs2006
Ranolazine: a review of its use in chronic stable angina pectoris.
Review in Drugs, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Ranolazine on Vascular Adrenergic Receptors in Rabbit Aorta.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Effects of GS-967, GS-6615 and ranolazine on the responses of the rabbit aorta to adrenergic nerve stimulation.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Facilitation of Insulin Effects by Ranolazine in Astrocytes in Primary Culture.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Article
- Extended-release ranolazine: critical evaluation of its use in stable angina.Vascular health and risk management · 2011Review
- Atrial-selective drugs for treatment of atrial fibrillation.Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2010Review
- Treatment of stable angina.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2007Review
- Novel therapeutic approaches to treating chronic angina in the setting of chronic ischemic heart disease.Clinical cardiology · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ranolazine (Ranexa), a piperazine derivative, is a new antianginal agent approved for the treatment of chronic stable angina pectoris for use as combination therapy when angina is not adequately controlled with other antianginal agents. While the exact mechanism of action of ranolazine is not known, its antianginal and anti-ischaemic effects do not appear to depend upon changes in blood pressure or heart rate. An extended-release (ER) oral formulation of ranolazine has been developed to facilitate twice-daily administration whilst maintaining therapeutically effective plasma concentrations. In patients with chronic stable angina, ranolazine ER monotherapy was shown to improve exercise duration at trough plasma drug concentration in a dose-dependent manner compared with placebo. The drug was effective as adjunctive therapy in patients with chronic stable angina whose condition was not controlled adequately with conventional antianginal therapy. In randomised clinical trials, ranolazine ER was well tolerated, with no overt effects on cardiovascular haemodynamics or conduction, apart from a modest increase in corrected QT (QTc) interval (but no torsades de pointes). Importantly, the efficacy and tolerability of ranolazine ER were not affected by comorbid conditions, including old age, heart failure (HF) or diabetes mellitus. Comparative trials of ranolazine ER with other antianginal agents and trials examining its effects on long-term morbidity and mortality in patients with ischaemic heart disease are required to determine with greater certainty the place of the drug in current antianginal therapy. Nevertheless, ranolazine ER may well prove to be a useful alternative and adjunct to conventional haemodynamic antianginal therapy in the treatment of chronic stable angina.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.