ReviewDrugs2006
Pharmacological management of women with mixed urinary incontinence.
Review in Drugs, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Short-term effect of adding pelvic floor muscle training to bladder training for female urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial.International urogynecology journal · 2015Trial
- Management of mixed urinary incontinence: IUGA committee opinion.International urogynecology journal · 2024Review
- Treatment of mixed urinary incontinence.Central European journal of urology · 2011Review
- Overactive bladder and mixed incontinence.Current urology reports · 2010Review
- Fesoterodine for overactive bladder: A review of the literature.Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) is a symptomatic diagnosis. It is defined by the International Continence Society as the complaint of involuntary leakage associated with urgency and also with exertion, effort, sneezing and coughing. A search of medical databases revealed that only a small number of limited studies that assess the prevalence, epidemiology and treatment of MUI have been conducted. Most studies have looked separately at either stress urinary incontinence or urgency urinary incontinence. Thus, management of MUI involves a combination of treatments for both stress and urgency incontinence, but should concentrate initially on the most bothersome and/or predominant symptom. Initial management includes an accurate history and examination, which is supplemented by a bladder diary and quality-of-life questionnaire. Once a preliminary diagnosis is established, first-line therapy includes patient education and lifestyle interventions, such as weight loss. This is supplemented by pelvic floor muscle training and bladder training, which help with both components of MUI. Oral pharmacotherapy often acts synergistically with the previous treatments; however, only very few randomised, placebo-controlled trials have looked at the effects of pharmacotherapy on MUI. The two main classes of drugs are the antimuscarinics, which are effective in urgency incontinence, and the serotonin-norepinephrine re-uptake inhibitors, which are effective in stress incontinence. Combination of these two drug classes is a feasible option but has not been tested in any trials to date. Should these treatments fail, then patients should be referred for cystometry to confirm the diagnosis. Treatment options available following urodynamics include invasive minor and major surgical procedures, which either treat the stress or urgency component of MUI but not both. Surgical procedures carry the risk of infection, haemorrhage and failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.